Williams v. Adams et al
Filing
133
AMENDED SECOND INFORMATIONAL ORDER - Notice And Warning Of Requirements For Opposing Defendants' Summary Judgment Motion (Doc. 77 ), signed by Magistrate Judge Sandra M. Snyder on 8/27/2012. (Fahrney, E)
1
2
3
4
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
5
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
6
7
MARCUS R. WILLIAMS,
1:05-cv-00124-AWI-SMS (PC)
8
Plaintiff,
9
vs.
10
ADAMS, et al,
AMENDED SECOND INFORMATIONAL
ORDER - NOTICE AND WARNING OF
REQUIREMENTS FOR OPPOSING
DEFENDANTS’ SUMMARY JUDGMENT
MOTION
11
Defendant(s).
(Doc. 77)
12
13
________________________________/
14
15
Plaintiff is proceeding pro se in this civil action. Defendants filed a motion for summary
16
judgment on December 1, 2008 and pursuant to Woods v. Carey, Nos. 09-15548, 09-16113, 2012
17
WL 2626912 (9th Cir. Jul. 6, 2012), Rand v. Rowland, 154 F.3d 952 (9th Cir. 1998), and
18
Klingele v. Eikenberry, 849 F.2d 409 (9th Cir. 1988), the Court hereby notifies Plaintiff of the
19
following rights and requirements for opposing the motion:
20
21
22
1. Unless otherwise ordered, all motions for summary judgment are briefed pursuant to
Local Rule 230(l).
2. Plaintiff is required to file an opposition or a statement of non-opposition to
23
Defendants’ motion for summary judgment. Local Rule 230(l). If Plaintiff fails to file an
24
opposition or a statement of non-opposition to the motion, this action may be dismissed, with
25
prejudice, for failure to prosecute. The opposition or statement of non-opposition must be filed
26
not more than 21 days after the date of service of the motion. Id.
1
3. A motion for summary judgment is a request for judgment on some or all of Plaintiff’s
claims in favor of Defendants without trial. Fed. R. Civ. P. 56(a). Defendants’ motion sets forth
the facts which they contend are not reasonably subject to dispute and that entitle them to
2
judgment as a matter of law. Fed. R. Civ. P. 56(c). This is called the Statement of Undisputed
3
Facts. Local Rule 260(a).
4
Plaintiff has the right to oppose a motion for summary judgment. To oppose the motion,
5
Plaintiff must show proof of his claims. Plaintiff may agree with the facts set forth in
6
Defendants’ motion but argue that Defendants are not entitled to judgment as a matter of law.
7
In the alternative, if Plaintiff does not agree with the facts set forth in Defendants’
8
motion, he may show that Defendants’ facts are disputed in one or more of the following ways:
9
(1) Plaintiff may rely upon statements made under the penalty of perjury in the complaint or the
10
opposition if (a) the complaint or opposition shows that Plaintiff has personal knowledge of the
11
matters stated and (b) Plaintiff calls to the Court’s attention those parts of the complaint or
12
opposition upon which Plaintiff relies; (2) Plaintiff may serve and file declarations setting forth
13
the facts which Plaintiff believes prove his claims;1 (3) Plaintiff may rely upon written records
14
but Plaintiff must prove that the records are what he claims they are; or (4) Plaintiff may rely
2
15
upon all or any part of the transcript of one or more depositions, answers to interrogatories, or
16
admissions obtained in this proceeding. If Plaintiff fails to contradict Defendants’ motion with
17
declarations or other evidence, Defendants’ evidence will be taken as truth, and final judgment
18
may be entered without a full trial. Fed. R. Civ. P. 56(e).
19
In opposing Defendants’ motion for summary judgment, Local Rule 260(b) requires
20
Plaintiff to reproduce Defendants’ itemized facts in the Statement of Undisputed Facts and admit
21
22
23
24
1
A declaration is a written statement setting forth facts (1) which are admissible in evidence, (2) which are
based on the personal knowledge of the person giving the statement, and (3) to which the person giving the statement
is competent to testify. 28 U.S.C. § 1746; Fed. R. Civ. P. 56(c)(4). A declaration must be dated and signed under
penalty of perjury as follows: “I declare (or certify, verify or state) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true
and correct. Executed on (date). (Signature).” 28 U.S.C. § 1746.
25
2
26
Sworn or certified copies of all papers referred to in the declaration must be included and served on the
opposing party. Fed.R.Civ.P. 56(e).
1
those facts which are undisputed and deny those which are disputed. If Plaintiff disputes (denies)
a fact, Plaintiff must cite to the evidence used to support that denial (e.g., pleading, declaration,
deposition, interrogatory answer, admission, or other document). Local Rule 260(b).
2
4. If discovery has not yet been opened or if discovery is still open and Plaintiff is not yet
3
able to present facts to justify the opposition to the motion, the Court will consider a request to
4
postpone consideration of Defendants’ motion. Fed. R. Civ. P. 56(d). Any request to postpone
5
consideration of Defendants’ motion for summary judgment must include the following: (1) a
6
declaration setting forth the specific facts Plaintiff hopes to elicit from further discovery, (2) a
7
showing that the facts exist, and (3) a showing that the facts are essential to opposing the motion
8
for summary judgment. Blough v. Holland Realty, Inc., 574 F.3d 1084, 1091 n.5 (9th Cir. 2009);
9
Tatum v. City and County of San Francisco, 441 F.3d 1090, 1100-01 (9th Cir. 2006); State of
10
California v. Campbell, 138 F.3d 772, 779 (9th Cir. 1998). The request to postpone the motion
11
for summary judgment must identify what information is sought and how it would preclude
12
summary judgment. Blough, 574 F.3d at 1091 n.5; Tatum, 441 F.3d at 1100-01; Margolis v.
13
Ryan, 140 F.3d 850, 853 (9th Cir. 1998); Local Rule 260(b).
14
5. Unsigned declarations will be stricken, and declarations not signed under penalty of
15
perjury have no evidentiary value.
16
6. The failure of any party to comply with this order, the Federal Rules of Civil
17
Procedure, or the Local Rules of the Eastern District of California may result in the imposition of
18
sanctions including but not limited to dismissal of the action or entry of default.
19
IT IS SO ORDERED.
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
Dated:
b742a4
August 27, 2012
/s/ Sandra M. Snyder
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?