Riley v. Scribner

Filing 56

ORDER GRANTING Petitioner's Fourth and Last 55 Motion for Extension of Time to File Objections to Findings and Recommendations, signed by Magistrate Judge John M. Dixon, Jr on 2/3/2009. Objections to F&R due by 2/17/2009. (Sondheim, M)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: hlked6 February 3, 2009 /s/ John M. Dixon UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE vs. A.K. SCRIBNER, Respondent. ________________________________/ ALBERT LEVELL RILEY, Petitioner, 1:05-CV-00350-LJO-JMD (HC) ORDER GRANTING PETITIONER'S FOURTH AND LAST MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE OBJECTIONS TO FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION (DOCUMENT #55) SEVEN DAY DEADLINE IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA Petitioner is a state prisoner proceeding in a habeas corpus action pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. On January 29, 2009, Petitioner filed a motion to extend time to file objections to the findings and recommendation. The Court notes that the current motion is Petitioner's fourth motion for extension of time and that Petitioner's objections were originally due in July 2008. Furthermore, Petitioner's cause for this current motion is questionable at best­Petitioner can make copies of his objections by hand if he desires a copy of his objection. While the Court grants Petitioner's motion for a seven day extension, the Court puts Petitioner on notice that this is the last extension of time the Court is willing to grant Petitioner and any further delay on Petitioner's part will result in the District Judge reviewing the case without Petitioner's objections. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Petitioner's motion for an extension of time is granted and Petitioner has seven (7) days from the date of service of this order in which to file objections to the findings and recommendation.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?