Gorton v. Bick et al

Filing 73

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS And RECOMMENDATIONS 70 , signed by District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 4/29/2009. It is ORDERED that: The Findings and Recommendations, filed February 25, 2009, is adopted in full; Defendant Bick is dismissed from this action, with prejudice, pursuant to Fed. R. Div. Pro. 41(a)(2); and Defendant Bick's motion for summary judgment 58 , filed October 27, 2008, is disregarded as moot. (Scrivner, E)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 9 10 11 v. 12 13 BICK, et al., 14 Defendants. 15 / 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Plaintiff Charles Robert Gorton, a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 72-302. On February 25, 2009, the Magistrate Judge filed a Findings and Recommendations herein which was served on the parties and which contained notice to the parties that any objections to the Findings and Recommendations were to be filed within thirty days. The parties have not filed timely objections to the Findings and Recommendations. In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C), this Court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the Court finds the Findings and Recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper analysis. /// /// 1 (Doc. 70) CHARLES ROBERT GORTON, Plaintiff, CASE NO. 1:05-CV-00354-LJO-DLB PC ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. 2. The Findings and Recommendations, filed February 25, 2009, is adopted in full; Defendant Bick is dismissed from this action, with prejudice, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. Pro. 41(a)(2); and 3. Defendant Bick's motion for summary judgment, filed October 27, 2008, is disregarded as moot. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: b9ed48 April 29, 2009 /s/ Lawrence J. O'Neill UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?