Gomez v. People of the State of California
ORDER signed by Judge Dale A. Drozd, INTRADISTRICT TRANSFER to Fresno. New case number 1:05-cv-652 OWW TAG (HC). Old case number 2:05-cv-884 LKK DAD (HC).(Waggoner, D)
(HC) Gomez v. People of the State of California
Page 1 of 2
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 vs. THE PEOPLE, Respondent. / Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed a petition for writ of habeas corpus on a state court form. Petitioner has also filed a motion for appointment of counsel. Petitioner has not paid the required filing fee or filed an application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis. In his habeas petition, petitioner challenges a judgment of conviction entered in the Kern County Superior Court on March 5, 2004. Kern County is located in the Fresno Division of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California. See Local Rule 3-120(b). Pursuant to Local Rule 3-120(d), a civil action which has not been commenced in the proper division of this court may, on the court's own motion, be transferred to the proper division of the court. Therefore, this action will be transferred to the Fresno Division of the court for all further proceedings. 1
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA DANIEL A. GOMEZ, Petitioner, No. CIV S-05-0884 LKK DAD P
Page 2 of 2
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26
Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. This action is transferred to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California sitting in Fresno; and 2. All future filings in this action shall bear the new Fresno case number and shall be filed at: United States District Court Eastern District of California 1130 "O" Street Fresno, CA 93721 DATED: May 17, 2005.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?