Nassr Mohamed, Et al. v. United States Department of Agriculture Food and Nutrition
Filing
131
STIPULATION and ORDER DISMISSING CASE signed by Magistrate Judge Sandra M. Snyder on 5/12/2011. Telephonic Status Conference set for May 16, 2011, is VACATED. CASE CLOSED. (Jessen, A)
1
5
BENJAMIN B. WAGNER
United States Attorney
ALYSON A. BERG
Assistant United States Attorney
United States Courthouse
2500 Tulare Street, Suite 4401
Fresno, California 93721
Telephone: (559) 497-4000
Facsimile: (559) 497-4099
6
Attorneys for Defendant United States of America
2
3
4
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
NASSR MOHAMED,and NABEEL
ABDULLA,
11
Plaintiffs,
12
v.
13
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
14
Defendant.
15
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
1:05-cv-0657-SMS
STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL;
ORDER
16
17
18
Pursuant to the terms of a written Settlement Agreement as well as the provisions of
19
Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1), the parties, by and through their respective counsel,
20
hereby stipulate that this action be dismissed with prejudice.
21
22
IT IS SO STIPULATED.
23
24
25
Respectfully submitted,
Dated: May 12, 2011
(As authorized 05/12/11)
By:
26
27
/s/Bruce Leichty
Bruce Leichty,
Attorney for Nassr Mohamed and
Nabeel Abdulla, Plaintiffs
28
1
STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL; PROPOSED ORDER
1
Dated: May 12, 2011
BENJAMIN B. WAGNER
United States Attorney
2
3
By:
4
5
/s/ Alyson A. Berg
ALYSON A. BERG
Assistant U.S. Attorney
Attorneys for Defendant
United States of America
6
ORDER OF DISMISSAL
7
The above stipulation is APPROVED, and this action is hereby DISMISSED WITH
8
PREJUDICE, each party to bear its own fees and costs.
9
Telephonic Status Conference hearing set for May 16, 2011 at 9:30 a.m. before Judge
10
Snyder is hereby Ordered Vacated.
11
12
13
14
IT IS SO ORDERED.
15
16
Dated:
icido3
May 12, 2011
/s/ Sandra M. Snyder
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL; PROPOSED ORDER
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?