Dustin v. G.M. Galaza, et al

Filing 44

ORDER, signed by Magistrate Judge Sandra M. Snyder on 10/7/2009. It is ORDERED that Plaintiff is granted an extension of time of thirty days from the date of service of this order in which to file an amended complaint. ( Amended Complaint due by 11/10/2009) (Scrivner, E)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 G. GALAZA, et al., vs. IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA DALE OWEN DUSTIN, Plaintiff, 1: 05 CV 00768 LJO YNP SMS (PC) ORDER Defendants. On September 9, 2009, a recommendation of dismissal was entered, recommending that this action be dismissed for Plaintiff's failure to file an amended complaint in compliance with an order dismissing the operative complaint in this action. On September 22, 2009, Plaintiff filed objections to the findings and recommendations. In his objections, Plaintiff indicates that he has attempted to file an amended complaint, but is obstructed in his efforts to make copies of the amended complaint. Plaintiff is advised that he need not submit a copy of the amended complaint to the Court. The Court will grant Plaintiff thirty days in which to file an amended complaint. Should Plaintiff fail to do so, the September 9, 2009, recommendation of dismissal will be submitted to the District Court. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff is granted an extension of time of thirty days from the date of service of this order in which to file an amended complaint. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: j14hj0 October 7, 2009 /s/ Sandra M. Snyder UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?