Pappas v. Mendoza-Powers

Filing 4

ORDER signed by Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 6/29/05, INTRADISTRICT TRANSFER from Sacramento 2:05cv1262 FCD KJM P to Fresno 1:05cv0857 REC TAG P(Sherman, T)

Download PDF
(HC) Pappas v. Mendoza-Powers Doc. 4 Case 1:05-cv-00857-LJO-TAG Document 4 Filed 06/30/2005 Page 1 of 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 vs. KATHY MENDOZA-POWERS, Respondent. / Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding with counsel, has filed an application for a writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. 2254. Petitioner has paid the filing fee. Petitioner challenges a decision by the Board of Prison Terms but he is in custody in Avenal State Prison, which is in the Fresno Division of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California. See Local Rule 3-120(b). As provided by Local Rule 3-120(d), a civil action that has not been commenced in the proper division of a court may, on the court's own motion, be transferred to the proper division of the court. Therefore, this action will be transferred to the Fresno Division of the court. ///// ///// 1 Dockets.Justia.com IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA PHILLIP PAPPAS, Petitioner, No. CIV S-05-1262 FCD KJM P ORDER Case 1:05-cv-00857-LJO-TAG Document 4 Filed 06/30/2005 Page 2 of 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 2/bb papp1262.100f Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. This action is transferred to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California sitting in Fresno; and 2. All future filings shall reference the new Fresno case number assigned and shall be filed at: United States District Court Eastern District of California 1130 "O" Street Fresno, CA 93721 DATED: June 29, 2005. ______________________________________ UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?