Howard v. Gradtillo et al

Filing 120

ORDER Directing Defendants to File a Response to Plaintiff's 119 Motion Filed March 10, 2014, signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 04/25/2014. (Flores, E)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

CLARENCE. HOWARD,

12

Plaintiff,

13
14

v.
GRADTILLO, et al.,

15

Defendants.

16

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

Case No.: 1:05-cv-00906-AWI-SAB (PC)
ORDER DIRECTING DEFENDANTS TO FILE A
RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FILED
MARCH 10, 2014
[ECF No. 119]

17

On June 24, 2013, the parties notified that the Court that they had settled this case in its

18

entirety. On June 25, 2013, by stipulation of the parties the instant action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. §

19

1983 was dismissed, with prejudice, pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) of the Federal Rules of Civil

20

Procedure. (ECF No. 117.)

21

On March 10, 2014, Plaintiff filed a motion for an order to show cause and temporary

22

restraining order to direct Defendants to comply with the settlement agreement. Defendants have not

23

filed a response to Plaintiff’s motion. Plaintiff’s motion was served on defense counsel via the Court’s

24

Case Management Electronic Filing System. (ECF No. 119.) In order to properly analyze Plaintiff’s

25

///

26

///

27

///

28

///
1

1

motion, the Court finds it necessary for Defendants to file a response to the motion within fifteen (15)

2

days from the date of service of this order.

3
4
5
6

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:

April 25, 2014
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2