Slaughter v. Stokes

Filing 120

ORDER GRANTING 119 Respondent's Unopposed Motion for Second Extension of Time to File Opposition Memorandum and ORDER Further Modifying Scheduling Order signed by District Judge Dale A. Drozd on 9/26/2017. (Jessen, A)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

MICHAEL COREY SLAUGHTER,

12

Petitioner,

13
14
15

v.
RON DAVIS, Warden of San Quentin
State Prison,

Case No. 1:05-cv-00922-DAD-SAB
DEATH PENALTY CASE
ORDER GRANTING RESPONDENT’S
UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR SECOND
EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE
OPPOSITION MEMORANDUM
(Doc. No. 119)

Respondent.

16

ORDER FURTHER MODIFYING
SCHEDULING ORDER
(Doc. No. 109)

17
18
19
20

Before the court is respondent’s motion for a thirty (30) day extension of time of the

21

current September 30, 2017 deadline for filing the memorandum of points and authorities in

22

opposition to the second amended petition for writ of habeas corpus. This extension of time,

23

respondent’s second, is necessary due to Deputy Attorney General Ryan McCarroll’s

24

responsibilities in other matters.
Deputy Attorney General McCarroll estimates that he has drafted ninety-five percent of

25
26

the opposition and represents that counsel for petitioner, Assistant Federal Defender Jennifer

27

Mann, does not oppose to the requested extension of time.

28

/////
1

1
2

The court finds good cause to grant respondent’s second request for an extension of time
and for modification of the court’s previously established briefing schedule in this case.

3

Accordingly,

4

1.

Respondent’s unopposed motion for second extension of time to file the

5

memorandum of points and authorities in opposition to the second amended

6

petition is granted to and including October 30, 2017. Petitioner shall file any

7

reply memorandum by not later than May 1, 2018.

8

2.

Petitioner shall file any motion for discovery, expansion of the record and/or

9

evidentiary hearing by not later than August 17, 2018. Respondent shall file any

10

opposition by not later than October 19, 2018. Petitioner shall file any reply by

11

not later than December 14, 2018.

12
13
14

3.

In all other regards the May 27, 2015 scheduling order shall continue in full force.

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:

September 26, 2017
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2