Slaughter v. Stokes

Filing 122

ORDER GRANTING 121 Respondent's Unopposed Motion for Third Extension of Time to File Opposition Memorandum and ORDER Further Modifying 109 Scheduling Order signed by District Judge Dale A. Drozd on 10/30/2017. (Gaumnitz, R)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

MICHAEL COREY SLAUGHTER,

12

Petitioner,

13
14
15

v.
RON DAVIS, Warden of San Quentin
State Prison,

Case No. 1:05-cv-00922-DAD-SAB
DEATH PENALTY CASE
ORDER GRANTING RESPONDENT’S
UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR THIRD
EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE
OPPOSITION MEMORANDUM
(Doc. No. 121)

Respondent.

16

ORDER FURTHER MODIFYING
SCHEDULING ORDER
(Doc. No. 109)

17
18
19

Before the court is a motion by respondent, through counsel Deputy Attorney

20
21

General Ryan McCarroll, to extend by thirty days the current October 30, 2017 deadline for filing

22

the memorandum of points and authorities in opposition to the second amended petition for writ

23

of habeas corpus. This extension of time, respondent’s third, is to allow for supervisory review of

24

the draft document, and Mr. McCarroll’s unanticipated responsibilities in another matter.

25

Respondent’s previous two unopposed extensions total sixty days.
Mr. McCarroll represents that counsel for petitioner, Assistant Federal Defender Kelly

26
27

Culshaw, does not oppose to the requested extension.

28

/////
1

1
2

The court finds good cause to grant respondent’s requested third extension and thereupon
further modify the court’s schedule in this case.

3

Accordingly,

4

1.

Respondent’s unopposed motion for third extension of time to file the

5

memorandum of points and authorities in opposition to the second amended

6

petition is granted to and including November 29, 2017. Petitioner shall file any

7

reply memorandum by not later than May 31, 2018.

8

2.

9

Petitioner shall file any motion for discovery, expansion of the record and/or
evidentiary hearing by not later than September 17, 2018. Respondent shall file

10

any opposition by not later than November 19, 2018. Petitioner shall file any reply

11

by not later than January 14, 2019.

12
13
14

3.

In all other regards the May 27, 2015 scheduling order shall continue in full force.

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:

October 30, 2017
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2