Slaughter v. Stokes

Filing 137

ORDER GRANTING Petitioner's Unopposed 136 Motion for Seventh Extension of Time to File Reply Memorandum; ORDER Further Modifying 109 Scheduling Order, signed by District Judge Dale A. Drozd on 11/21/19. (Marrujo, C)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

MICHAEL COREY SLAUGHTER,

12
13
14
15
16

Petitioner,
v.
RON DAVIS, Warden of San Quentin
State Prison,

Case No. 1:05-cv-00922-DAD
DEATH PENALTY CASE
ORDER GRANTING PETITIONER’S
UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR SEVENTH
EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE REPLY
MEMORANDUM
(Doc. No. 136)

Respondent.
ORDER FURTHER MODIFYING
SCHEDULING ORDER
(Doc. No. 109)

17
18
19
20

Before the court is a motion brought by petitioner, through counsel Assistant Federal

21

Defenders Jennifer Mann and Kelly Culshaw, to extend the deadline for filing the reply to

22

respondent’s memorandum of points and authorities in opposition to the second amended petition

23

for writ of habeas corpus from November 29, 2019 to February 27, 2020. This extension of time,

24

petitioner’s seventh, is necessary due to counsel’s responsibilities in other matters.

25
26
27
28

Counsel represent that counsel for respondent, Deputy Attorney General Ryan McCarroll,
does not oppose the requested extension.
The court finds good cause to grant the instant motion and thereupon further modify the
court’s scheduling order in this case.
1

1

Accordingly,

2

1.

Petitioner’s unopposed motion for seventh extension of time to file the reply to

3

respondent’s memorandum of points and authorities in opposition to the second

4

amended petition for writ of habeas corpus is granted to and including February

5

27, 2020.

6

2.

Petitioner shall file any motion for discovery, expansion of the record and/or

7

evidentiary hearing by not later than August 31, 2020. Respondent shall file any

8

opposition by not later than November 2, 2020. Petitioner shall file any reply by

9

not later than January 4, 2021.

10
11
12

3.

In all other regards the May 27, 2015 scheduling order shall continue in full force.

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:

November 21, 2019
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2