Slaughter v. Stokes
Filing
143
ORDER GRANTING 142 Petitioner's Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to File Motion for Evidentiary Hearing, Record Expansion and/or Discovery signed by District Judge Dale A. Drozd on 8/25/2020. Motion due by 10/30/2020. Opposition to Motion due by 1/15/2021. Reply to Opposition due by 3/19/2021. (Jessen, A)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
MICHAEL COREY SLAUGHTER,
12
13
14
15
16
Petitioner,
v.
RON DAVIS, Warden of San Quentin State
Prison,
Case No. 1:05-cv-00922-DAD
DEATH PENALTY CASE
ORDER GRANTING PETITIONER’S
UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR EXTENSION
OF TIME TO FILE MOTION FOR
EVIDENTIARY HEARING, RECORD
EXPANSION AND/OR DISCOVERY
Respondent.
(Doc. No. 142)
17
18
19
20
Before the court is a motion brought by petitioner, through counsel Assistant Federal
21
Defender Jennifer Mann, to extend the deadline for filing a motion for evidentiary hearing,
22
expansion of the record and/or discovery from August 31, 2020 to October 30, 2020. This
23
extension of time is necessary due to counsel’s responsibilities in other matters.
24
25
Ms. Mann represents to the court that counsel for respondent, Deputy Attorney General
Ryan McCarroll, does not object to the requested extension.
26
The court finds good cause to grant the instant motion.
27
Accordingly, petitioner’s unopposed motion to extend the deadline for filing a motion for
28
evidentiary hearing, expansion of the record and/or discovery (Doc. No. 142) is granted to and
1
1
including October 30, 2020. Respondent shall file any opposition to the motion by not later than
2
January 15, 2021. Petitioner shall file any reply to the opposition by not later than March 19,
3
2021.
4
IT IS SO ORDERED.
5
Dated:
August 25, 2020
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?