Slaughter v. Stokes

Filing 143

ORDER GRANTING 142 Petitioner's Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to File Motion for Evidentiary Hearing, Record Expansion and/or Discovery signed by District Judge Dale A. Drozd on 8/25/2020. Motion due by 10/30/2020. Opposition to Motion due by 1/15/2021. Reply to Opposition due by 3/19/2021. (Jessen, A)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 MICHAEL COREY SLAUGHTER, 12 13 14 15 16 Petitioner, v. RON DAVIS, Warden of San Quentin State Prison, Case No. 1:05-cv-00922-DAD DEATH PENALTY CASE ORDER GRANTING PETITIONER’S UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE MOTION FOR EVIDENTIARY HEARING, RECORD EXPANSION AND/OR DISCOVERY Respondent. (Doc. No. 142) 17 18 19 20 Before the court is a motion brought by petitioner, through counsel Assistant Federal 21 Defender Jennifer Mann, to extend the deadline for filing a motion for evidentiary hearing, 22 expansion of the record and/or discovery from August 31, 2020 to October 30, 2020. This 23 extension of time is necessary due to counsel’s responsibilities in other matters. 24 25 Ms. Mann represents to the court that counsel for respondent, Deputy Attorney General Ryan McCarroll, does not object to the requested extension. 26 The court finds good cause to grant the instant motion. 27 Accordingly, petitioner’s unopposed motion to extend the deadline for filing a motion for 28 evidentiary hearing, expansion of the record and/or discovery (Doc. No. 142) is granted to and 1 1 including October 30, 2020. Respondent shall file any opposition to the motion by not later than 2 January 15, 2021. Petitioner shall file any reply to the opposition by not later than March 19, 3 2021. 4 IT IS SO ORDERED. 5 Dated: August 25, 2020 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?