Gudino v. Adams, et al.
ORDER GRANTING 32 Motion for Extension To File Objections to Findings and Recommendations signed by Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto on 6/29/2010. (Objections to F&R due by 8/3/2010) (Marrujo, C)
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 vs. B.C. ADAMS, et al., (Motion#32) Defendants. 30-DAY DEADLINE ________________________________/ Plaintiff is a prisoner proceeding pro se in a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On June 25, 2010, plaintiff filed a motion to extend time to file objections to findings and recommendations. Plaintiff has offered no explanation as to why he is unable to submit objections on time. However, the Court will grant Plaintiff's motion for an extension. Plaintiff is advised that any future request for an extension of time must be accompanied by a demonstration that good cause exists to justify an extension of time. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: Plaintiff is granted thirty (30) days from the date of service of this order in which to file his objections to the findings and recommendations. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: 0mee June 29, 2010 /s/ Sheila K. Oberto UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE SABINO NUNEZ GUDINO, Plaintiff, 1:05-cv-00954 LJO SKO (PC) ORDER GRANTING FIRST MOTION TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE OBJECTIONS TO FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?