Barnett v. Norman, et al.

Filing 357

ORDER Requiring Defendants to Respond to Plaintiff's Motions for Attendance of Incarcerated Witnesses by 12/3/2015, signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 11/23/2015. (Jessen, A)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 9 TROAS V. BARNETT, Plaintiff, 10 11 12 13 v. MARTIN GAMBOA, et al., Defendants. 14 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No.: 1:05-cv-01022-BAM (PC) ORDER REQUIRING DEFENDANTS TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF’S MOTIONS FOR ATTENDANCE OF INCARCERATED WITNESSES 15 16 Plaintiff Troas Barnett (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis 17 in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The parties have consented magistrate judge 18 jurisdiction. (Plaintiff’s consent, ECF No. 9; Defendants’ consent, ECF No. 62.) This action proceeds 19 on Plaintiff’s claims that Defendants Gamboa, Duran, and Torres used excessive physical force 20 against him in violation of his rights under the Eighth Amendment of the United States Constitution 21 and that Defendant Torres failed to intervene to protect Plaintiff from harm in violation of his rights 22 under the Eighth Amendment. 23 On November 5, 2015, Plaintiff filed motions for the attendance of incarcerated witnesses 24 Jermain Delfonso, Manrique Jorge Luis, and Jammal Desean Jennings. (ECF Nos. 344-46.) Under this 25 Court’s scheduling order, any response to those motions must be filed on or before December 3, 2015. 26 The scheduling order stated that the filing of any response to a motion for obtaining the attendance of 27 witnesses is optional. However, the Court now finds that in order to evaluate Plaintiff’s motions, it 28 1 1 will require Defendants’ position on whether these proposed witnesses should be compelled to attend 2 trial in this matter to testify. 3 Accordingly, it is HEREBY ORDERED that on or before December 3, 2015, Defendants shall 4 file a response to Plaintiff’s motions for the attendance of incarcerated witnesses Jermain Delfonso, 5 Manrique Jorge Luis, and Jammal Desean Jennings. (ECF Nos. 344-46.) Any request for an extension 6 of time to comply with this order will require a showing of good cause. 7 8 9 10 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: /s/ Barbara November 23, 2015 A. McAuliffe _ UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?