Barnett v. Norman, et al.

Filing 96

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Gerald B. Cohn on 5/10/2011 requiring Defendants to file opposition or a statement of non-opposition re 70 MOTION for Retention of MRI Radiographs and the VHS 11-4-03 Video CTC S.A.T.F. and 80 MOTION for a Judge Magistrate's Court Order Placing the Attached Photographs Under Seal (Filing Deadline: 6/13/2011). (Lundstrom, T)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 9 TROAS V. BARNETT, 10 Plaintiff, 11 12 v. DAVID NORMAN, et al., 13 CASE NO. 1:05-cv-01022-GBC (PC) ORDER REQUIRING DEFENDANTS TO FILE OPPOSITION OR STATEMENT OF NONOPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR RETENTION OF MRI RADIOGRAPHS AND MOTION FOR PLACING PHOTOGRAPHS UNDER SEAL Defendants. (Docs. 70, 80) 14 / THIRTY-DAY DEADLINE 15 16 On August 19, 2010, Plaintiff filed a motion for retention of MRI radiographs. (Doc. 70). 17 On November 12, 2010, Plaintiff filed a motion to place photographs under seal. (Doc. 80). 18 Defendants were required to file an opposition or a statement of non-opposition to the motion within 19 twenty-one days, but has not done so. Local Rule 78-230(m). 20 21 Accordingly, within thirty (30) days from the date of service of this order, Defendants must file an opposition or a statement of non-opposition to the above-mentioned motions. 22 23 IT IS SO ORDERED. 24 25 Dated: 0jh02o May 10, 2011 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 26 27 28 1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?