Harris v. Bakeman et al

Filing 67

ORDER, signed by District Judge Susan R. Bolton on 4/2/09: Plaintiff's Request for an Extension 65 is GRANTED. The due date for his response is June 1, 2009; IT IS FURTHER ORDERED denying as moot Plaintiff's request for an order regarding his legal property. (Hellings, J)

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 On March 9, 2009 this Court granted Plaintiff his requested 30 day extension to respond to Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment. On March 20, 2009 Plaintiff requested a 60 day extension claiming he did not have his legal property and therefore was unable to properly respond to Defendant's motion. Defendant filed a Non-Opposition to Plaintiff's Second Request for an Extension of Time and advised the Court therein that Plaintiff's transfer was a temporary one to a medical facility and he has since returned to the California State Prison - Sacramento where his legal materials remained during his brief transfer to the medical facility. vs. Bruce M. Bakeman, et al., Defendants. David D. Harris, Plaintiff, ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) No. 1:05-CV-01097-PHX-SRB ORDER IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA FRESNO DIVISION

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

IT IS ORDERED granting Plaintiff's Request for an Extension. The due date for his response is June 1, 2009. (Doc. 65). IT IS FURTHER ORDERED denying as moot Plaintiff's request for an order regarding his legal property.

DATED this 2nd day of April, 2009.

-2-