Ocasio v. Yates

Filing 4

ORDER, INTRADISTRICT TRANSFER to Sacramento. New Case number 2:05-cv-11 GEB DAD. signed by Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 01/03/06. (Gil-Garcia, A)

Download PDF
(HC) Ocasio v. Yates Doc. 4 Case 1:05-cv-01172-REC-LJO 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 U . S . District C o u r t E. D . C alifor nia cd Document 4 Filed 01/04/2006 Page 1 of 2 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA JOSE OCASIO, Petitioner, v. JAMES A. YATES, Warden, Respondent. / 1:05-CV-1172 REC LJO HC ORDER OF TRANSFER Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed a habeas corpus action pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2254 and has paid the filing fee. The petitioner is challenging a conviction from San Joaquin County, which is part of the Sacramento Division of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California. Therefore, the petition should have been filed in the Sacramento Division. Pursuant to Local Rule 3-120(b), a civil action which has not been commenced in the proper court may, on the court's own motion, be transferred to the proper court. Therefore, this action will be transferred to the Sacramento Division. Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. This action is transferred to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California sitting in Sacramento; and 1 Dockets.Justia.com Case 1:05-cv-01172-REC-LJO 1 2 3 4 5 IT IS SO ORDERED. 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 U . S . District C o u r t E. D . C alifor nia cd Document 4 Filed 01/04/2006 Page 2 of 2 2. All future filings shall reference the new Sacramento case number assigned and shall be filed at: United States District Court Eastern District of California 501 "I" Street, Suite 4-200 Sacramento, CA 95814 Dated: 23ehd0 January 3, 2006 /s/ Lawrence J. O'Neill UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?