Natural Resources Defense Council et al v. Norton et al

Filing 1132

ORDER Granting in Part Plaintiff's 1117 Motion to Substitute Parties, signed by Chief Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 10/10/17. Knights Landing Investors, LLC and Pelger Road 1700, LLC added. Christo D. Bardis and Fred Tenhunfeld terminated. (Gonzalez, R)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL, et al., 9 Plaintiffs, 10 Case No. 1:05-cv-01207-LJO-EPG ORDER GRANTING IN PART PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION TO SUBSTITUTE PARTIES (ECF NO. 1117) v. 11 12 13 RYANK ZINKE, U.S. Department of the Interior, et al., Defendants. 14 15 16 SAN LUIS & DELTA MENDOTA WATER AUTHORITY, et al., 17 Defendants-Intervenors. 18 19 ANDERSON-COTTONWOOD IRRIGATION DISTRICT, et al., 20 Joined Parties. 21 22 23 Upon careful consideration of Plaintiffs’ Motion to Substitute Parties, oppositions thereto, 24 replies, and supplemental filings, as well as the relevant statutory and case law, the Court hereby 25 GRANTS THE MOTION IN PART. Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 25(c) and 26 consistent with the agreement of all parties, it is hereby ORDERED that Knights Landing 27 Investors, LLC is substituted for Defendant Fred Tenhunfeld, et al., and that Pelger Road 1700, 28 LLC is substituted for Defendants Christo D. Bardis, John Reynen, and Judith Reynen. Cranmore PROOF OF SERVICE. CASE NO. 1:05-CV-01207 LJO-EPG 1 2 3 Farms, LLC (“Cranmore”) will not be made a party to the case at this time, with the understanding that Plaintiffs may obtain relevant testimony and documents from Cranmore pursuant to normal discovery procedures. 4 5 6 7 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: October 10, 2017 /s/ Lawrence J. O’Neill _____ UNITED STATES CHIEF DISTRICT JUDGE 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 PROOF OF SERVICE. CASE NO. 1:05-CV-01207 LJO-EPG

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?