Natural Resources Defense Council et al v. Norton et al

Filing 134

NON RELATED CASE ORDER signed by Judge Lawrence K. Karlton on 09/28/05. The court will not relate the current case to case number 88-1658 LKK/GGH. (Brown, T)

Download PDF
(TAG) Natural Resources Defense Council et al v. Norton et al Doc. 134 Case 1:05-cv-01207-OWW-NEW Document 134 Filed 09/29/2005 Page 1 of 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Plaintiffs, 13 v. 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 The court is in receipt of a Notice of Related Cases filed by the plaintiffs in the above-captioned cases. Plaintiffs seek to v. GALE A. NORTON, etc., et al., Defendants. / NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL, et al., Plaintiffs, CIV. NO. F-05-1207 OWW/LJO NON-RELATED CASE ORDER KIRK C. RODGERS, etc., et al., Defendants. / NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL, et al., CIV. NO. S-88-1658 LKK/GGH UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA relate N.R.D.C. v. Norton, et al., N.D. Cal. No. Civ 05-000690, Dockets.Justia.com Case 1:05-cv-01207-OWW-NEW Document 134 Filed 09/29/2005 Page 2 of 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 transferred by Judge Wilken to Judge Wanger, to the abovecaptioned case. Under the Local Rules of this court, the judge with the lowest case number will resolve the propriety of relating a case. In the instant matter, my case carries the lowest number. I have consulted with Judge Wanger, and we have concluded that, under the Local Rule's standards, the case is properly related to both my case and Judge Wanger's case. Nonetheless, it is our joint judgement that the purposes of relation are best served by leaving the case with Judge Wanger. Accordingly, the court will not relate the case to N.R.D.C. v. Rogers, et al., No. Civ. S-88-1658 LKK. IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED: September 28, 2005. /s/Lawrence K. Karlton LAWRENCE K. KARLTON SENIOR JUDGE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?