Bull v. Scribner, et al.
Filing
103
ORDER DENYING 101 Motion for Court to Stop Collection of Filing Fee signed by Magistrate Judge Erica P. Grosjean on 9/13/2016. (Jessen, A)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
EMMANUEL BULL,
12
Plaintiff,
13
vs.
14
ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR
COURT TO STOP COLLECTION OF
FILING FEE
(ECF No. 101.)
WARDEN A. K. SCRIBNER, et al.,
15
1:05-cv-01255-LJO-GSA-PC
Defendants.
16
17
18
19
I.
BACKGROUND
20
This case was dismissed on March 21, 2013 based on Plaintiff’s failure to exhaust
21
administrative remedies pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1997e(a), and judgment was entered. (ECF
22
Nos. 91, 92.) Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, now brings a
23
motion for the Court to stop collection of the filing fee for this action from Plaintiff’s prison
24
trust account. (ECF No. 101.)
25
II.
IN FORMA PAUPERIS STATUS – 28 U.S.C. § 1915
26
Section 1915 of Title 28 of the United States Code governs proceedings in forma
27
pauperis. “Plaintiffs normally must pay [the filing fee] to file a civil complaint in federal
28
district court, 28 U.S.C. ' 1914(a), but 28 U.S.C. ' 1915(a)(1) allows the district court to waive
1
1
the fee, for most individuals unable to afford it, by granting in forma pauperis status.”
2
Andrews v. Cervantes, 493 F.3d 1047, 1051 (9th Cir. 2007). However, notwithstanding being
3
granted leave to proceed in forma pauperis, “if a prisoner brings a civil action . . , the prisoner
4
shall be required to pay the full amount of a filing fee” through payments deducted from the
5
prisoner’s prison trust account. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(1). After payment of an initial filing fee,
6
if any, “the prisoner shall be required to make monthly payments of 20 percent of the preceding
7
month’s income credited to the prisoner’s account. The agency having custody of the prisoner
8
shall forward payments from the prisoner’s account to the clerk of the court each time the
9
amount in the account exceeds $10 until the filing fees are paid.” 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(2).
10
III.
PLAINTIFF’S MOTION
11
Plaintiff requests the Court to stop the California Department of Corrections and
12
Rehabilitation (CDCR) from continuing to collect payment from his prison trust account
13
statement for the filing fee for this action, because he is indigent and was granted leave to
14
proceed in forma pauperis in this action.
15
B.
16
Plaintiff filed this case on October 3, 2005 and submitted an application to proceed in
17
forma pauperis pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915. (ECF Nos. 1, 2.) On October 28, 2005, the
18
Court issued orders granting Plaintiff leave to proceed in forma pauperis and directing the
19
CDCR to send payments to the Clerk of the Court from Plaintiff’s prison trust account
20
statement until the filing fee of $250.00 was paid in full. (ECF Nos. 5, 6.)
Discussion
21
In forma pauperis status allows a prisoner’s case to be filed and proceed without full
22
payment of the filing fee, but does not excuse the prisoner from payment of the filing fee in
23
payments, over time, from the prisoner’s trust account. Under the federal statute, the Court is
24
required to collect payments for the filing fee when funds exist. 28 U.S.C. 1915(b)(1),(2).
25
Plaintiff’s argument that he cannot afford to pay the filing fee is unpersuasive. Numerous
26
prisoners in similar circumstances are paying the filing fees for their lawsuits in this manner.
27
Plaintiff provides no evidence that the CDCR is not properly collecting payments for the filing
28
fee pursuant to the Court’s order. Therefore, Plaintiff’s motion shall be denied.
2
1
2
3
IV.
CONCLUSION
Based on the foregoing, Plaintiff’s motion for the Court to stop collection of the filing
fee for this action, filed on October 28, 2015, is DENIED.
4
5
6
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
September 13, 2016
/s/
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?