Bull v. Scribner, et al.

Filing 103

ORDER DENYING 101 Motion for Court to Stop Collection of Filing Fee signed by Magistrate Judge Erica P. Grosjean on 9/13/2016. (Jessen, A)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 EMMANUEL BULL, 12 Plaintiff, 13 vs. 14 ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR COURT TO STOP COLLECTION OF FILING FEE (ECF No. 101.) WARDEN A. K. SCRIBNER, et al., 15 1:05-cv-01255-LJO-GSA-PC Defendants. 16 17 18 19 I. BACKGROUND 20 This case was dismissed on March 21, 2013 based on Plaintiff’s failure to exhaust 21 administrative remedies pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1997e(a), and judgment was entered. (ECF 22 Nos. 91, 92.) Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, now brings a 23 motion for the Court to stop collection of the filing fee for this action from Plaintiff’s prison 24 trust account. (ECF No. 101.) 25 II. IN FORMA PAUPERIS STATUS – 28 U.S.C. § 1915 26 Section 1915 of Title 28 of the United States Code governs proceedings in forma 27 pauperis. “Plaintiffs normally must pay [the filing fee] to file a civil complaint in federal 28 district court, 28 U.S.C. ' 1914(a), but 28 U.S.C. ' 1915(a)(1) allows the district court to waive 1 1 the fee, for most individuals unable to afford it, by granting in forma pauperis status.” 2 Andrews v. Cervantes, 493 F.3d 1047, 1051 (9th Cir. 2007). However, notwithstanding being 3 granted leave to proceed in forma pauperis, “if a prisoner brings a civil action . . , the prisoner 4 shall be required to pay the full amount of a filing fee” through payments deducted from the 5 prisoner’s prison trust account. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(1). After payment of an initial filing fee, 6 if any, “the prisoner shall be required to make monthly payments of 20 percent of the preceding 7 month’s income credited to the prisoner’s account. The agency having custody of the prisoner 8 shall forward payments from the prisoner’s account to the clerk of the court each time the 9 amount in the account exceeds $10 until the filing fees are paid.” 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(2). 10 III. PLAINTIFF’S MOTION 11 Plaintiff requests the Court to stop the California Department of Corrections and 12 Rehabilitation (CDCR) from continuing to collect payment from his prison trust account 13 statement for the filing fee for this action, because he is indigent and was granted leave to 14 proceed in forma pauperis in this action. 15 B. 16 Plaintiff filed this case on October 3, 2005 and submitted an application to proceed in 17 forma pauperis pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915. (ECF Nos. 1, 2.) On October 28, 2005, the 18 Court issued orders granting Plaintiff leave to proceed in forma pauperis and directing the 19 CDCR to send payments to the Clerk of the Court from Plaintiff’s prison trust account 20 statement until the filing fee of $250.00 was paid in full. (ECF Nos. 5, 6.) Discussion 21 In forma pauperis status allows a prisoner’s case to be filed and proceed without full 22 payment of the filing fee, but does not excuse the prisoner from payment of the filing fee in 23 payments, over time, from the prisoner’s trust account. Under the federal statute, the Court is 24 required to collect payments for the filing fee when funds exist. 28 U.S.C. 1915(b)(1),(2). 25 Plaintiff’s argument that he cannot afford to pay the filing fee is unpersuasive. Numerous 26 prisoners in similar circumstances are paying the filing fees for their lawsuits in this manner. 27 Plaintiff provides no evidence that the CDCR is not properly collecting payments for the filing 28 fee pursuant to the Court’s order. Therefore, Plaintiff’s motion shall be denied. 2 1 2 3 IV. CONCLUSION Based on the foregoing, Plaintiff’s motion for the Court to stop collection of the filing fee for this action, filed on October 28, 2015, is DENIED. 4 5 6 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: September 13, 2016 /s/ UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?