Westlake v. California Department of Corrections et al

Filing 13

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS 12 ; ORDER Dismissing Action signed by District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 2/3/2008. CASE CLOSED.(Esteves, C)

(PC) Westlake v. California Department of Corrections et al

Doc. 13

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Plaintiff, is a state prisoner proceeding pro se in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was vs. ORDER DISMISSING ACTION J. WOODFORD, et al., Defendants. / JOHN WESTLAKE, Plaintiff, 1:05-cv-01293-LJO-DLB-P ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION (Doc. 12) UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 72-302. On April 25, 2007, the Magistrate Judge filed Findings and a Recommendation herein which were served on plaintiff and which contained notice to plaintiff that any objections to the Findings and Recommendation were to be filed within thirty (30) days. date, plaintiff has not filed objections to the Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendation. In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 73-305, this Court has conducted a 1
Dockets.Justia.com

To

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

de novo review of this case.

Having carefully reviewed the

entire file, the Court finds the Findings and Recommendation to be supported by the record and by proper analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. The Findings and Recommendation, filed December 3,

2007, are ADOPTED IN FULL; and, 2. This action is DISMISSED based on plaintiff's failure

to obey the court's order of April 25, 2007. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: b9ed48 February 3, 2008 /s/ Lawrence J. O'Neill UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

2