Anlin Industries, Inc. vs. Paul Burgess

Filing 159

ORDER GRANTING Defendant's Ex Parte Request for Extension of Time 158 , signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis L. Beck on 4/29/09. (Hellings, J)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 7 8 9 10 Plaintiff, 11 v. 12 PAUL BURGESS, 13 14 Defendant. 15 16 On April 29, 2009, Defendant Paul Burgess submitted a request for leave to serve 17 documents by priority mail. He explained that he successfully filed one document at 11:54 p.m. 18 on April 28, 2009, the due date for the filings, but because of problems with CM/ECF, the 19 remaining documents were not filed until the early morning of April 29, 2009. He was 20 completely unable to file one document and requests that the Court allow him to send the 21 documents by priority mail. 22 To the extent that Plaintiff requests an extension of time, his request is GRANTED. The 23 documents filed on April 28 and 29, 2009 (Documents 154 through 157) shall be deemed timely. 24 The Court will also deem the priority mail filing timely and will scan the document into CM/ECF 25 upon receipt. 26 IT IS SO ORDERED. 27 Dated: 28 9b0hie ANLIN INDUSTRIES, INC., a California corporation ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 1:05cv1317 DLB ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT'S EX PARTE REQUEST FOR EXTENSION OF TIME (Document 158) UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT April 29, 2009 /s/ Dennis L. Beck UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?