Duhn Oil Tool Inc v. Cooper Cameron Corporation

Filing 780

SCHEDULING ORDER inviting comments from the parties regarding the allocation of costs and whether costs should be awarded to defendant Cameron as the prevailing party; case management deadline set for 8/10/2012 for receipt of same. In the event the Court concludes that defendant is the prevailing party, the Court requests defendant to file their proposed bill of costs by 8/31/2012 with objections to same due by 9/7/2012. The Court further sets a TELEPHONIC STATUS HEARING re the proposed judgme nt and whether defendant is the prevailing party to be heard on 8/17/2012 at 01:30 PM before District Judge Marilyn L. Huff. The parties are also DIRECTED to file the stipulation regarding the counterclaims by 8/10/2012; order signed by District Judge Marilyn L. Huff on 7/31/2012. (Rooney, M)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, FRESNO DIVISION

10
11

DUHN OIL TOOL, INC.,

CASE NO. 1:05-CV-1411-MLH-GSA

12

SCHEDULING ORDER

13

Plaintiff,
vs.
COOPER CAMERON CORPORATION,

14

Defendant.

15
16

In its proposed judgment filed on July 27, 2012, the Court invited comments from the

17 parties on the allocation of costs and whether costs should be awarded to Defendant Cameron
18 as the prevailing party, due by August 10, 2012. (Doc. No. 779.). In the event that the Court
19 concludes that Defendant Cameron is the prevailing party, the Court, pursuant to Local Rule
20 292, requests that Defendant Cameron submit to the Court its proposed bill of costs by August
21 31, 2012. In accordance with Local Rule 292, Plaintiff Duhn Oil may file its objections to
22 Defendant Cameron’s proposed bill of costs by September 7, 2012.
23

Additionally, the Court sets a telephonic hearing on the proposed judgment and whether

24 Defendant Cameron is the prevailing party for August 17, 2012 at 1:30 p.m. The parties
25 should contact Chambers on or before August 16, 2012 at 5:00 p.m. to provide a phone
26 number at which the parties can be reached.
27 ///
28 ///
-1-

05cv1411

1

Further, in a telephonic status hearing on July 27, 2012, the parties indicated to the

2 Court that they would file a stipulation to dismiss Defendant Cameron’s counterclaims.
3 Accordingly, the Court orders the parties to file their stipulation regarding the counterclaims
4 on or before August 10, 2012.
5

IT IS SO ORDERED.

6 DATED: July 31, 2012
7
________________________________
MARILYN L. HUFF, District Judge
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-2-

05cv1411