Duhn Oil Tool Inc v. Cooper Cameron Corporation

Filing 788

FINAL JUDGMENT dated 8/17/2012 signed by District Judge Marilyn L. Huff on 8/17/2012. (Lundstrom, T)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, FRESNO DIVISION 9 10 DUHN OIL TOOL, INC., CASE NO. 1:05-CV-01411-MLH-GSA 11 Plaintiff, 12 FINAL JUDGMENT vs. 13 14 CAMERON INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION, 15 Defendant. 16 17 This is a patent lawsuit filed by Plaintiff Duhn Oil Tool, Inc. (“Duhn Oil”) against 18 Cooper Cameron Corporation (“Cameron”). The patent-in-suit is United States Patent No. 19 6,920,925 “Wellhead Isolation Tool” (“the ‘925 patent”). On November 9, 2005, Plaintiff 20 Duhn Oil filed a complaint for patent infringement against Defendant Cameron. (Doc. No. 1.) 21 Following a jury trial and a bench trial on certain issues, and in accordance with the jury's 22 verdict and the Court’s orders, the Court issues judgment under Federal Rule of Civil 23 Procedure 58(a). 24 IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED THAT: 25 Claims 1, 2, 4, 5, 19, and 29 of the ‘925 patent are invalid for anticipation by the ‘94 26 catalog under 35 U.S.C. § 102. (Doc. No. 764.) 27 Claim 3 is invalid as obvious under 35 U.S.C. § 103. (Doc. No. 775.) 28 Therefore, all asserted claims of the ‘925 patent are invalid. (Doc. Nos. 764, 775.) The -1- 1:05cv01411 1 Court issues judgment in favor of Defendant Cameron International and against Plaintiff Duhn 2 Oil Tool, Inc. The Court grants costs to Cameron as the prevailing party. Each party will bear 3 its own attorney’s fees as the Court concludes this is not an exceptional case under 35 U.S.C. 4 § 285. 5 IT IS SO ORDERED. 6 DATED: August 17, 2012 7 _____________________________________ 8 MARILYN L. HUFF, District Judge UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -2- 1:05cv01411

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?