Ochotorena v. Adams et al
Filing
110
ORDER REQUIRING Plaintiff to File Supplemental Opposition to Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment; Opposition Due Within Twenty-One Days, signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis L. Beck on 6/27/11. (Hellings, J)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
9
10
RICHARD A. OCHOTORENA,
11
Plaintiff,
12
13
CASE NO. 1:05-CV-01524-LJO-DLB PC
ORDER REQUIRING PLAINTIFF TO FILE
SUPPLEMENTAL OPPOSITION TO
DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY
JUDGMENT
v.
DERRAL G. ADAMS, et al.,
14
Defendants.
OPPOSITION DUE WITHIN TWENTY-ONE
DAYS
/
15
16
Plaintiff Richard A. Ochotorena (“Plaintiff”) is a prisoner in the custody of the California
17
Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation (“CDCR”). Plaintiff is proceeding pro se and in
18
forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This action is proceeding
19
against Defendants Adams, Kalkis, Reynoso, Curtiss, Duncan, Fambrough, Lane, and Rodriquez.
20
On April 3, 2009, Defendants filed a motion for partial summary judgment. Doc. 55.
21
Plaintiff moved for a Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56(d) motion, which the Court granted on
22
March 19, 2010. Based on a review of the record, all discovery in this matter has been resolved.
23
Plaintiff is required to file a supplemental opposition to Defendants’ motion for summary
24
judgment.
25
Accordingly, it is HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff is to serve and file a supplemental
26
opposition to Defendants’ motion for summary judgment within twenty-one (21) days from the
27
///
28
///
1
1
date of service of this order. Defendants will be provided seven (7) days from the date of service
2
of Plaintiff’s opposition in which to serve and file their supplemental reply, if any. Failure to file
3
a supplemental opposition will be construed as a waiver of the opportunity to file.
4
5
6
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
June 27, 2011
/s/ Dennis L. Beck
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?