Ochotorena v. Adams et al
Filing
121
ORDER Requiring Plaintiff to File Supplemental Opposition to Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment, signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis L. Beck on 12/20/2011. (Supplemental Opposition to Defendants' Motion - 30 Day Deadline) (Martin-Gill, S)
1
2
3
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
4
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
5
6
RICHARD A. OCHOTORENA,
7
8
9
CASE NO. 1:05-CV-01524-LJO-DLB PC
Plaintiff,
ORDER REQUIRING PLAINTIFF TO FILE
SUPPLEMENTAL OPPOSITION TO
DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY
JUDGMENT
v.
DERRAL G. ADAMS, et al.,
10
Defendants.
OPPOSITION DUE WITHIN THIRTY DAYS
/
11
12
Plaintiff Richard A. Ochotorena (“Plaintiff”) is a prisoner in the custody of the California
13
Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation (“CDCR”). Plaintiff is proceeding pro se and in
14
forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This action is proceeding
15
against Defendants Adams, Kalkis, Reynoso, Curtiss, Duncan, Fambrough, Lane, and Rodriquez.
16
On April 3, 2009, Defendants filed a motion for partial summary judgment. Doc. 55.
17
Plaintiff moved for a Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56(d) motion, which the Court granted on
18
March 19, 2010. Based on a review of the record, all discovery in this matter has been resolved.
19
Plaintiff is required to file a supplemental opposition to Defendants’ motion for summary
20
judgment.
21
Accordingly, it is HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff is to serve and file a supplemental
22
opposition to Defendants’ motion for summary judgment within thirty (30) days from the date of
23
service of this order. Defendants will be provided seven (7) days from the date of service of
24
Plaintiff’s opposition in which to serve and file their supplemental reply, if any. Failure to file a
25
supplemental opposition will be construed as a waiver of the opportunity to file.
26
27
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
3b142a
December 20, 2011
/s/ Dennis L. Beck
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
28
1
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?