Wathan v. Merced County Sheriff, et al.

Filing 123

ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO MODIFY THE SCHEDULING CONFERENCE ORDER. Jury Trial set for 6/1/2009 at 08:30 AM in Courtroom 4(LJO) before District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill, Pretrial Conference set for 5/11/2009 at 08:15 AM in Courtroom 4(LJO) before District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill. The parties are ordered to file a joint pretrial statement on or before 5/6/2009. signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis L. Beck on 4/29/2009. (Hernandez, M)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 HELEN WATHAN, et al., 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 1 Plaintiffs Helen and James Wathan ("Plaintiffs") filed the instant motion to continue the trial and pretrial conference on April 16, 2009. The matter was heard on April 24, 2009, before the Honorable Dennis L. Beck, United States Magistrate Judge. James Hoey appeared on behalf of Plaintiffs. James Arendt appeared on behalf of Defendants Doug Hays, Jon McKnight and Russ Sharrock ("Defendants"). DISCUSSION Trial is currently set for May 27, 2009. The pretrial conference was set for April 13, 2009, although the parties submitted a stipulation to continue the conference and were notified that the requested date was not available. By this motion, Plaintiffs seek to continue the trial and pretrial dates. Defendants opposed the motion on April 22, 2009. ) ) ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) MERCED COUNTY SHERIFF MARK N. ) PAZIN, et al., ) ) ) ) Defendants. ) ) 1:05cv1609 AWI DLB ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO MODIFY THE SCHEDULING CONFERENCE ORDER (Document 119-2) Trial: June 1, 2009, 8:30 a.m. Courtroom 4 The Honorable Lawrence J. O'Neill Pretrial Conference: May 11, 2009, 8:15 a.m. Courtroom 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 16(b) provides that "[a] schedule shall not be modified except upon a showing of good cause . . ." Plaintiffs seek to modify the scheduling order to accommodate their police procedures expert, Ronald Martinelli, Ph.D. Plaintiffs explain that in February 2009, Plaintiff's counsel, James Hoey, spoke with Dr. Martinelli. Dr. Martinelli did not indicate at that time that he was unavailable on that date, though counsel admitted at the hearing that the conversation was focused on ensuring that Dr. Martinelli understood that the action was going forward and availability was not discussed. On April 13, 2009, Dr. Martinelli informed Mr. Hoey that he would be out of the country for the month of May and was scheduled to testify at another trial during the first week of June, and would therefore be unavailable if trial started on May 27. Declaration of James Hoey, 4. Plaintiffs believe that good cause exists because Mr. Hoey only recently learned that Dr. Martinelli was unavailable for a May 27, 2009, trial date. They also contend that his testimony is crucial to their action. While this may be true, the Court does not necessarily agree that it constitutes good cause. Although Mr. Hoey talked to Dr. Martinelli prior to the continuance of the trial date, he did not confirm that he was available to start trial on May 27, 2009. Moreover, as the parties are aware, the Court has altered the schedule on more than one occasion to accommodate Mr. Hoey. Nonetheless, because prejudice to Defendants can be limited by moving the trial just a few days, the Court GRANTS the motion. The parties have indicated that June 2, 2009, is an acceptable date to start trial. However, the Court cannot accommodate date. Instead, trial is SET for Monday, June 1, 2009, in Courtroom 4, at 8:30 a.m., before the Honorable Lawrence J. O'Neill.1 The pretrial conference is SET for May 11, 2009, in Courtroom 4, at 8:15 a.m., before the Honorable Lawrence J. O'Neill. The parties are ordered to file a Joint Pretrial Statement pursuant to Local Rule 16-281(a)(2) on or before May 6, 2009. The parties are further directed Although this action is assigned to the Honorable Anthony W . Ishii, Judge O'Neill is the only district court j u d g e who can accommodate a date close to the requested date of June 2, 2009. 1 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 to submit a digital copy of their pretrial statement in Word Perfect X32 format, directly to Judge O'Neill's chambers by email at LJOOrders@caed.uscourts.gov. Counsels' attention is directed to Rules 16-281 and 16-282 of the Local Rules of Practice for the Eastern District of California, as to the obligations of counsel in preparing for the pre-trial conference. The Court will insist upon strict compliance with those rules. ORDER 1. 2. Plaintiffs' motion to modify the scheduling conference order is GRANTED; Trial is set for Monday, June 1, 2009, in Courtroom 4, at 8:30 a.m., before the Honorable Lawrence J. O'Neill; 3. The pretrial conference is set for May 11, 2009, in Courtroom 4, at 8:15 a.m., before the Honorable Lawrence J. O'Neill. The parties are ordered to file a joint pretrial statement on or before May 6, 2009. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: 3b142a April 29, 2009 /s/ Dennis L. Beck UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 If W o r d P e r fe c t X3 is not available to the parties then the latest version of W o r d P e r fe c t or any other word p r o c e s s in g program in general use for IBM compatible personal computers is acceptable. 2 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?