Vlasich v. Fishback, et al

Filing 144

ORDER REPLACING Defendants' 132 Motion for Summary Judgment of January 29, 2010 with Defendants' Renewed 141 Motion for Summary Judgment of April 30, 2010; ORDER for Plaintiff to File Opposition, or Statement of Non-Opposition, to the April 30, 2010 Motion within Thirty Days signed by Magistrate Judge Gary S. Austin on 5/24/2010. Opposition or Non-opposition due by 6/28/2010. (Sant Agata, S)

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 Defendants. 17 _____________________________/ 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Steven Vlasich ("plaintiff") is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff filed this action on December 20, 2005. This action now proceeds on plaintiff's original complaint, against defendants Juarez, Villa, and Fishback. On January 29, 2010, Defendants Juarez and Villa ("Defendants") filed a motion for summary judgment. (Doc. 132.) On April 29, 2010, the Clerk notified Defendants of a discrepancy in the filing of the motion and directed Defendants to re-submit the motion. (Doc. 139.) On April 30, 2010, Defendants re-submitted the motion. (Doc. 141.) Therefore, the later-filed motion for summary judgment now replaces replace the prior motion for summary judgment. Plaintiff is now excused from filing a response to the January 29, 2010 motion for summary judgment. However, 1 ORDER FOR PLAINTIFF TO FILE OPPOSITION, OR STATEMENT OF OPPOSITION, TO THE APRIL 30, 2010 MOTION WITHIN THIRTY DAYS vs. DR. TIMOTHY FISHBACK, et al., STEVEN VLASICH, Plaintiff, 1:05-cv-01615-LJO-GSA-PC ORDER REPLACING DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT OF JANUARY 29, 2010 WITH DEFENDANTS' RENEWED MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT OF APRIL 30, 2010 (Docs. 132, 141.) IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15

Plaintiff must file an opposition, or statement of non-opposition, to the April 30, 2010 motion for summary judgment within thirty days, pursuant to this order. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. Defendants' motion for summary judgment filed on January 29, 2010, is REPLACED WITH Defendants' motion for summary judgment filed on April 30, 2010; 2. Plaintiff is excused from filing a response to Defendants' January 29, 2010 motion for summary judgment; 3. Plaintiff is required to file an opposition, or statement of non-opposition, to Defendants' April 30, 2010 motion for summary judgment within thirty days of the date of service of this order; and 4. The Clerk is DIRECTED to resolve Defendants' motion for summary judgment, filed January 29, 2010, on the docket.

IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: 6i0kij

May 24, 2010

/s/ Gary S. Austin UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2