Jacobs v. Sullivan et al

Filing 146

ORDER Setting Telephonic Conference Call, signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 2/6/2015. (Telephonic Scheduling Conference set for 3/16/2015 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 9 (SAB) before Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone.) (Fahrney, E)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 GEORGE E. JACOBS IV, 12 Plaintiff, 13 14 v. ALEXANDER, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 Plaintiff George Jacobs is appearing pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action 17 18 ) Case No.: 1:05-cv-01625-SAB (PC) ) ) ) ORDER SETTING TELEPHONIC CONFERENCE CALL ) ) ) ) ) ) pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. 19 This action is proceeding against Defendants Crotty, Nelson, Watson, Chan, McGregor, 20 Alexander, Carrasco, Blankenship, Jobb, Granillo, Johnson, and Salazar (aka Adams), for violation of 21 Plaintiff’s right under the Eighth Amendment. This action is now ready to be set for trial. On February 6, 2015, pursuant to the parties’ 22 23 consent, the case was reassigned from Magistrate Judge Gary S. Austin to the undersigned for all 24 further proceedings, including trial and entry of final judgment. (ECF No. 145.) In the interest of 25 accommodating the parties’ schedules, the Court will hold a telephonic hearing for scheduling 26 purposes. 27 /// 28 /// 1 1 Accordingly, 2 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 3 1. 4 A telephonic scheduling hearing will be held on March 16, 2015, at 10:00 a.m., in Courtroom 9 before the undersigned; 5 2. Counsel for Defendants is directed to arrange for telephone contact with Plaintiff; and 6 3. Counsel for Defendants is directed to contact Courtroom Deputy, Mamie Hernandez, at 7 (559) 499-5672, prior to the hearing date, to receive instructions regarding the conference call. 8 9 10 11 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: February 6, 2015 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?