Bobby James Williams v. Hickman, Et Al.

Filing 47

ORDER DENYING Plaintiff's 45 Motion to Appoint Counsel ; ORDER DENYING Plaintiff's 46 Request for Ruling on Plaintiff's Request for Entry of Default Against Defendant Bracken signed by District Judge G. Murray Snow on 8/26/2009. (Sant Agata, S)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 R O D E R IC K HICKMAN, et al., 13 Defendants. 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 P e n d in g before the Court is Plaintiff's Motion for the Appointment of Counsel (Dkt. # 45) and Motion for Ruling on Plaintiff's Request for Entry of Default Against Defendant B ra c k en (Dkt. # 46). Plaintiff has twice previously filed motions to appoint counsel and tw ic e those motions have been denied. (See Dkt. ## 11, 28). Plaintiff has not provided any a d d itio n a l reason sufficient to justify the appointment of counsel. Therefore the request is d e n ie d as it has been twice before. A s for Plaintiff's motion for ruling on request for entry of default, Plaintiff's D e c la ra tio n entered in support of his request for entry of default (Dkt. # 36) he states "[t]he c o u rt files and record in this action show that Defendant Bracken was served by the United S ta te s Marshal with a copy of summons and a copy of the second amended complaint on May 1 4 , 2009." (Dkt. # 36 at p. 2). With all due respect, there is no such entry on the Court's vs. B O B B Y JAMES WILLIAMS, Plaintiff, ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) N o . CV-1:05-01649-GMS ORDER IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT F O R THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 d o c k e t, therefore nothing on the Court's docket establishes that the Plaintiff is entitled to the e n try of default as against Defendant Bracken. Therefore, I T IS HEREBY ORDERED denying Plaintiff's Motion for Appointment of Counsel (D k t. # 45). I T IS FURTHER ORDERED denying Plaintiff's (Motion) Request for Ruling on P lain tiff 's Request for Entry of Default Against Defendant Bracken (Dkt. # 46). D A T E D this 26th day of August, 2009. -2-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?