Kenneth Hurst, Et Al. v. Steve Newman, Et Al.

Filing 24

STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE signed by Judge Oliver W. Wanger on 1/17/2006. Case closed.(Lucas, G)

Download PDF
Case 1:06-cv-00036-OWW-SMS Document 24 Filed 01/17/2006 Page 1 of 4 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Ayesha N. Khan (motion for admission pro hac vice pending) Richard B. Katskee (admitted pro hac vice) Sara J. Rose (admitted pro hac vice) Heather L. Weaver (motion for admission to the Bar of this court pending) AMERICANS UNITED FOR SEPARATION OF CHURCH AND STATE 518 C St., NE Washington, DC 20002 Tel: (202) 466-3234 Fax: (202) 466-2587 akhan@au.org / katskee@au.org / rose@au.org / weaver@au.org Maurice A. Leiter (Bar No. 123732) John Danos (Bar No. 210964) ARNOLD & PORTER LLP 777 South Figueroa Street, 44th Floor Los Angeles, CA 90017-5844 Telephone: (213) 243-4000 Facsimile: (213) 243-4199 Maury_Leiter@aporter.com / John_Danos@aporter.com Attorneys for Plaintiffs HURST, et al. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA KENNETH HURST, et al., Plaintiffs, v. STEVE NEWMAN, et al., Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CASE NO. 1:06-CV-00036-OWW-SMS STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE; ORDER Case 1:06-cv-00036-OWW-SMS Document 24 Filed 01/17/2006 Page 2 of 4 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 By and through their attorneys of record, plaintiffs KENNETH HURST, JOAN BALCOME, KIRK ROGER TINGBLAD, BARRY S. GOLDBERG, SOPHIE GOLDBERG, JEANNIE PARENT, KEN and JODY VALMASSY, and ANN and RICHARD HOWARD (collectively, "Plaintiffs") and defendants STEVE NEWMAN, PAULA REGAN, STACEY GUSTAFSON, KITTY JO NELSON, PHYLLIS THROCKMORTON, JOHN WIGHT, DAN PENNER, and SHARON LEMBURG (collectively, "Defendants"), hereby agree and stipulate as follows: WHEREAS, Plaintiffs and Defendants have resolved their dispute in this matter upon the conditions set forth below; WHEREAS, Defendants have the capacity and authority to bind the El Tejon Unified School District (the "School District") and the Frazier Mountain High School (the "High School") to the provisions set forth herein; THEREFORE, the parties stipulate, and request that the Court enter an Order, as follows: (1) Defendants shall cause the course entitled "Philosophy of Design" or "Philosophy of Intelligent Design" to be terminated and discontinued no later than January 27, 2006; (2) No school over which the School District has authority, including the High School, shall offer, presently or in the future, the course entitled "Philosophy of Design" or "Philosophy of Intelligent Design" or any other course that promotes or endorses creationism, creation science, or intelligent design; (3) Plaintiffs' lawsuit is dismissed with prejudice; 1 Stipulation for Dismissal with Prejudice Case 1:06-cv-00036-OWW-SMS Document 24 Filed 01/17/2006 Page 3 of 4 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 (4) The Court reserves jurisdiction to enforce this Order such that, in the event that the School District fails to comply with this Order, plaintiffs or Americans United for Separation of Church and State may file a motion with this Court seeking enforcement of this Order, and Defendants are hereby deemed to have submitted irrevocably to the jurisdiction and venue of this Court, and to have waived any objection thereto, for any proceeding arising out of this Order; (5) Each party shall bear his or her own costs and fees, including attorneys' fees, with respect to this lawsuit. DATED: January 14, 2006 __/s/ Richard B. Katskee_______________ Richard B. Katskee Attorney for Plaintiffs DATED: January 14, 2006 __/s/ Peter C. Carton__________________ Peter C. Carton, Attorney for Defendants IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED: _Jan. 17,2006 /s/ OLIVER W. WANGER Honorable Oliver W. Wanger United States District Judge #388514v1 2 Stipulation for Dismissal with Prejudice Case 1:06-cv-00036-OWW-SMS Document 24 Filed 01/17/2006 Page 4 of 4 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 i

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?