Sevilla v. Adams, et al.

Filing 73

ORDER/Notice To Plaintiff That Case Has Been Referred To The Pro Bono Program For The Appointment Of Counsel, signed by Magistrate Judge Sandra M. Snyder on 9/7/2010. (Scrivner, E)

Download PDF
(PC) Sevilla v. Adams, et al. Doc. 73 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Plaintiff Ronald Victor Sevilla, a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, filed this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 on February 16, 2006. Plaintiff has sought and been denied the appointment of counsel at various stages in these proceedings, most recently on May 17, 2010. The Court recently screened Plaintiff's fifth amended complaint and recommended that the action proceed against Defendants Bradish, Roscoe, Gonzales, and Bhatt for violation of the Eighth Amendment, arising from medical care issues. Following the review of Plaintiff's fifth amended complaint, the Court selected this case for referral to the Eastern District of California's Pro Bono Program and requested the Program Director seek an attorney willing to represent Plaintiff. /// /// /// /// /// 1 Dockets.Justia.com UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT RONALD VICTOR SEVILLA, Plaintiff, v. DERRAL ADAMS, et al., Defendants. / CASE NO. 1:06-cv-00172-LJO-SMS PC NOTICE TO PLAINTIFF THAT CASE HAS BEEN REFERRED TO THE PRO BONO PROGRAM FOR THE APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 This informational order serves as notice to Plaintiff that his case has been referred for the appointment of counsel. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: icido3 September 7, 2010 /s/ Sandra M. Snyder UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?