Exmundo v. Scribner et al

Filing 102

ORDER DIRECTING the Clerk of the Court to Send the Parties the Court's Standard Form to Consent to or Decline Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction; ORDER REQUIRING the Parties to Return the Forms Within Ten Days, signed by District Judge Anthony W. Ishii on 12/18/2013. (Marrujo, C)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 6 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 7 8 EMILITO EXMUNDO, 9 Plaintiff, 12 ORDER DIRECTING THE CLERK OF THE COURT TO SEND THE PARTIES THE COURT’S STANDARD FORM TO CONSENT TO OR DECLINE MAGISTRATE JUDGE JURISDICTION Defendants. 10 11 CASE NO. 1:06--CV-0205 AWI DLB PC ORDER REQUIRING THE PARTIES TO RETURN THE FORMS WITHIN TEN DAYS v. BELL, et al., 13 14 15 Plaintiff is proceeding in this civil rights action against prison officials. This action is set 16 for jury trial on February 11, 20013. At this time, the Court is currently scheduled to be in trial 17 with criminal cases during this time. 18 Out of fairness, the Court believes it is necessary to forewarn litigants that the Fresno 19 Division of the Eastern District of California now has the heaviest District Judge caseload in the 20 entire nation. While the Court will use its best efforts to resolve this case and all other civil cases 21 in a timely manner, the parties are admonished that not all of the parties’ needs and expectations 22 may be met as expeditiously as desired. As multiple trials are now being set to begin upon the 23 same date, parties may find their case trailing with little notice before the trial begins. The law 24 requires the Court give any criminal case priority over civil trials and other matters, and the Court 25 must proceed with criminal trials even if a civil trial is older or was set earlier. 26 are scheduled to begin on the same day, this civil trial will trail day to day or week to week until 27 completion of any criminal case. 28 If multiple trials The parties are reminded of the availability of a United States Magistrate Judge to conduct 1 all proceedings in this action. A United States Magistrate Judge is available to conduct trials, 2 including entry of final judgment, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 28 U.S.C. 636(c), Federal Rule of Civil 3 Procedure 73, and Local Rule 305. 4 Defendants with the Court’s standard form to consent to or decline Magistrate Judge jurisdiction. 5 Within ten days of this order’s date of service, the parties shall either consent to or decline 6 Magistrate Judge jurisdiction by filling out the requisite forms and returning them to the Court. 7 The parties are advised that the same jury pool is used by both United States Magistrate The Court will direct the Clerk of the Court to provide 8 Judges and United States Article III District Court Judges. Any appeal from a judgment entered 9 by a United States Magistrate Judge is taken directly to the United States Court of Appeal for the 10 11 Ninth Circuit. Finally, for the parties’ information, the Fresno Division, whenever possible, is 12 utilizing United States Article III District Court Judges from throughout the country as Visiting 13 Judges. Pursuant to the Local Rules, Appendix A, such reassignments will be random, and the 14 parties will receive no advance notice before their case is reassigned to an Article III District Court 15 Judge from outside the Fresno Division of the Eastern District of California. 16 17 The parties are hereby informed that no substantive rulings or decisions will be affected by whether a party chooses to consent. 18 Accordingly, the court orders that: 19 1. 20 21 The Clerk of the Court is DIRECTED to provide the parties with the forms that will allow them to consent or decline Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction; and 2. Within ten days from this order’s date of service, the parties shall notify the Court 22 whether they consent to or decline Magistrate Judge jurisdiction by filling out the enclosed forms 23 and returning them to the Court. 24 25 26 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: December 18, 2013 SENIOR DISTRICT JUDGE 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?