Ransom v. Scribner, et al.

Filing 96

ORDER Granting Defendants' Motions to Extend Time to File Reply in Support of Motion for Summary Judgment Nunc Pro Tunc 77 , 83 , signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis L. Beck on 4/21/11. (Gonzalez, R)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

9

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

BRYAN E. RANSOM,

12

Plaintiff,

13
14

vs.
A. K. SCRIBNER, et al.,

15

Defendants.

16

1:06-CV-00208-LJO-DLB PC
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’
MOTIONS TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE
REPLY IN SUPPORT OF MOTION FOR
SUMMARY JUDGMENT NUNC PRO
TUNC

________________________________/

17

(Motions 77, 83)

Plaintiff is a prisoner proceeding pro se in a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. §

18

1983. On December 8, 2010 and January 24, 2011, Defendants filed a motion to extend time to

19

file reply in support of their motion for summary judgment. Defendants subsequently filed their

20

reply on March 15, 2011. Doc. 95. Good cause having been presented to the court and GOOD

21

CAUSE APPEARING THEREFOR, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

22
23

Defendants’ motions for extension of time to file a reply in support of their motion for
summary judgment is granted nunc pro tunc. Defendants’ reply is considered timely.

24
25
26
27
28

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
77e0d6

April 21, 2011

/s/ Dennis L. Beck
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE