Vallarine v. Freeman, et al.
Filing
71
ORDER AFTER SETTLEMENT STATUS CONFERENCE signed by District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on April 16, 2009. Settlement Status Conference set for 5/14/2009 at 08:15 AM in Courtroom 4(LJO) before District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill. (Lira, I)
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 1 vs. DOUGLAS E. FREEMAN, et al., Defendants. / The Court held settled case status conference on April 16, 2009 at 8:15 a.m. in Courtroom 4 (LJO). Plaintiff Alan J. Vallarine, D.D.S. appeared by telephone by counsel Stephen E. Carroll. Defendant Fresno Dental Surgery Center, Inc. appeared by telephone by counsel Bonnie Anderson. Defendants Vickie A. Kaspryzk and David Kaspryzk appeared by telephone by counsel Kenneth Powell. Defendants Douglas E. Freeman, D.D.S., deceased, and Carol E. Freeman, proceeding in propria persona, did not appear. Based on the discussion of the parties and this Court at the status conference, this Court SETS a further settlement status conference on Thursday, May 14, 2009 at 8:15 a.m. in Courtroom 4 (LJO). The parties may appear at the conference by arranging a one line conference call and telephoning the Court at 559-499-5680. No later than May 7, 2009, the parties shall file a joint settlement status report. If, by May 12, 2009, the Board has not met to vote on the settlement agreement, this Court shall order the Board to convene at a date and time set by this Court to conduct the vote. If the parties file dispositive papers prior to May 14, 2009, this Court shall vacate the settlement status conference. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: b9ed48 April 16, 2009 /s/ Lawrence J. O'Neill UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE ALAN J. VALLARINE, D.D.S., Plaintiff, CASE NO. CV F 06-0239 LJO DLB ORDER AFTER SETTLEMENT STATUS CONFERENCE IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?