Hernandez v. Danielson et. al.

Filing 25

ORDER ADOPTING 20 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS IN FULL, DISMISSING Plaintiff's Fourteenth Amendment Claim and DISMISSING Defendants S. Danielson; R. Galaviz; Nichols; Alvarez and B L Contreras, signed by Judge Oliver W. Wanger on 8/13/2009. (Jessen, A)

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 S. DANIELSON, et al., 12 Defendants. 13 14 15 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se in this civil rights action. The matter 16 was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local 17 Rule 72-302. 18 On July 2, 2009, findings and recommendations were entered, recommending 19 dismissal of certain claims and defendants. Plaintiff was provided an opportunity to file 20 objections within thirty days. Plaintiff has not filed objections to the findings and 21 recommendations. 22 In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636 (b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 23 73-305, this court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the 24 entire file, the court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and 25 proper analysis. 26 1 vs. ORDER RE: FINDINGS & RECOMMENDATIONS (#20) RAYMOND HERNANDEZ, Plaintiff, 1: 06 CV 00258 OWW YNP SMS (PC) IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26

Accordingly, THE COURT HEREBY ORDERS that: 1. The Findings and Recommendations issued by the Magistrate Judge on July 2, 209, are adopted in full; and 2. Plaintiff's Fourteenth Amendment claim is dismissed. 3. Defendants Danielson, Nichols, Alvarez, Contreras and Galaviz are dismissed.

IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: August 13, 2009 emm0d6 /s/ Oliver W. Wanger UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

2