Britz Fertilizers, Inc. v. Bayer Corporation et al

Filing 83

STIPULATION and ORDER TO RESET MOTION HEARING as to 56 MOTION to COMPEL PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS AND FURTHER TESTIMONY OR IN THE ALTERNATIVE MOTION FOR IN CAMERA REVIEW OF DISPUTED DOCUMENTS: Motion Hearing RESET from 1/9/2009 to 1/30/2009 at 09:00 AM in Courtroom 9 (DLB) before Magistrate Judge Dennis L. Beck. signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis L. Beck on 1/7/2009. (Hernandez, M)

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

STEPHEN T. CLIFFORD, ESQ., SBN 39020 T. MARK SMITH, ESQ., SBN 162370 Clifford & Brown A Professional Corporation Attorneys at Law 1430 Truxtun Avenue, Suite 900 Bakersfield, CA 93301 661-322-6023 661-322-3508 fax Attorneys for Defendants BAYER CORPORATION and BAYER CROPSCIENCE, LP IN THE UNITED SATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, FRESNO DIVISION BRITZ FERTILIZERS, INC., Plaintiff, vs. BAYER CORPORATION; BAYER CROPSCIENCE, LP, Defendants ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No.: 1:06-CV-00287-OWW-DLB STIPULATION TO CONTINUE HEARING DATE ON PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO COMPEL PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS AND FURTHER TESTIMONY, OR IN THE ALTERNATIVE, MOTION FOR IN CAMERA REVIEW OF DISPUTED DOCUMENTS; ORDER THEREON Currently Set: DATE: January 9, 2009 TIME: 9:00 A.M. CTRM: 9 Continued to: DATE: January 30, 2009 TIME: 9:00 A.M. CTRM: 9

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties hereto, Plaintiff Britz Fertilizers, Inc. and Defendants Bayer Corporation and Bayer CropScience, L.P., through their respective undersigned attorneys, that the date set forth in the Court's Order dated December 1, 2008 for the hearing on Plaintiff's Motion to Compel Production of Documents and Further

1 Stipulation to Continue Hearing Date on Plaintiff's Motion to Compel Production of Documents and Further Testimony, or in the Alternative, Motion for In-Camera Review of Disputed Documents; Order Thereon

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

Testimony Re James Rushford, or in the Alternative, Motion for In-Camera Review of Disputed Documents be continued from January 9, 2009 to January 30, 2009 at 9:00 a.m. in Courtroom 9. DAMRELL, NELSON, SCHRIMP, PALLIOS, PACHER & SILVA FRAME & MATSUMOTO Dated: By Roger M. Schrimp Attorneys for Plaintiff .

CLIFFORD & BROWN Dated: By Stephen T. Clifford T. Mark Smith Attorneys for Defendants .

ORDER The hearing on Plaintiff's Motion to Compel Production of Documents and Further Testimony, Re James Rushford, or in the Alternative, Motion for In Camera Review of Disputed Documents shall be continued from January 9, 2009 to January 30, 2009 at 9:00 a.m. in Courtroom 9 of the above-entitled Court. DATED: 7 January 2009 _/s/_Dennis L. Beck_______ Honorable Dennis L. Beck

2 Stipulation to Continue Hearing Date on Plaintiff's Motion to Compel Production of Documents and Further Testimony, or in the Alternative, Motion for In-Camera Review of Disputed Documents; Order Thereon