Delyea v. United States Postal Service et al

Filing 41

STIPULATION ORDER DISMISSING CASE signed by Magistrate Judge Sandra M. Snyder on 02/01/2008. CASE CLOSED. (Flores, E)

Download PDF
Delyea v. United States Postal Service et al Doc. 41 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 McGREGOR W. SCOTT United States Attorney BRIAN W. ENOS Assistant United States Attorney United States Courthouse 2500 Tulare Street, Suite 4401 Fresno, California 93721 Telephone: (559) 497-4000 Facsimile: (559) 497-4099 Attorneys for Defendant United States of America UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA JANET DELYEA, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE, ) UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ) YORK CONTRACTING, INC., a ) California corporation, ) RICHARD YORK, individually, ) and DOES 1 through 25, ) inclusive, ) ) Defendants. ) ) ) 1:06-cv-00403-SMS STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL; ORDER RE SAME 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Pursuant to this stipulation as well as the provisions of Fed. R. Civ. Proc. 41(a)(1), the parties to this action, by and through their respective counsel, hereby stipulate that this action be dismissed with prejudice. The parties respectfully request that the Court endorse this stipulation by way of formal order. /// /// 1 S T I P U L A T I O N FOR DISMISSAL; [PROPOSED] ORDER RE SAME Dockets.Justia.com 1 2 3 4 5 IT IS SO STIPULATED. Dated: January 31, 2008 January 31, 2008 Respectfully submitted, DREYER, BABICH, BUCCOLA & CALLAHAM ( A s . Auth. 1/31/08) McGREGOR W. SCOTT United States Attorney 6 7 8 9 10 IT IS SO ORDERED. 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2 S T I P U L A T I O N FOR DISMISSAL; [PROPOSED] ORDER RE SAME /s/ Roger A. Dreyer ROGER A. DREYER Attorneys for Janet Delyea /s/ Brian W. Enos_______ BRIAN W. ENOS Attorneys for United States of America ORDER OF DISMISSAL Dated: icido3 February 1, 2008 /s/ Sandra M. Snyder UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?