Fields v. Roberts
Filing
75
ORDER Adopting FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS (Doc. 71 ), ORDER Dismissing Defendant Roberts From This Action Based On Plaintiff's Failure To Effect Service, signed by Chief Judge Anthony W. Ishii on 3/10/2012. (Fahrney, E)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
9
10
KEVIN E. FIELDS,
11
12
13
Plaintiff,
vs.
P. ROBERTS, et al.,
14
15
16
Defendants.
1:06-cv-00407-AWI-GSA-PC
ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS
AND RECOMMENDATIONS
(Doc. 71.)
ORDER DISMISSING DEFENDANT
ROBERTS FROM THIS ACTION BASED
ON PLAINTIFF'S FAILURE TO EFFECT
SERVICE
_____________________________/
Kevin E. Fields (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se in this civil rights action
17
pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant
18
to 28 U.S.C. ' 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.
19
On January 5, 2012, findings and recommendations were entered, recommending that
20
defendant P. Roberts be dismissed from this action based on Plaintiff’s failure to effect service. On
21
January 19, 2012, Plaintiff filed a notice of voluntary dismissal of defendant P. Roberts.
22
In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. ' 636 (b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 304, this
23
Court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the
24
Court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and proper analysis.
25
Accordingly, THE COURT HEREBY ORDERS that:
26
1.
27
28
The Findings and Recommendations issued by the Magistrate Judge on January 5,
2012, are ADOPTED in full;
1
1
2.
2
3
Defendant P. Roberts is DISMISSED from this action based on Plaintiff's failure to
effect service; and
3.
4
The Clerk is DIRECTED to reflect the dismissal of defendant P. Roberts from this
action on the court's docket.
5
6
IT IS SO ORDERED.
7
8
Dated:
0m8i78
March 10, 2012
CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?