Palmer v. Woodford et al
Filing
122
ORDER Adopting 121 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Regarding DISMISSAL of Defendant Lopez for Failure to Effectuate Service of Process signed by District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 8/12/2013. (Sant Agata, S)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
WILL MOSES PALMER, III,
12
Plaintiff,
13
v.
14
JORDNT, et al.,
15
Defendants.
16
17
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Case No.: 1:06-cv-00512-LJO-BAM PC
ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND
RECOMMENDATIONS REGARDING
DISMISSAL OF DEFENDANT LOPEZ FOR
FAILURE TO EFFECTUATE SERVICE OF
PROCESS
(ECF No. 111, 112, 120, 121)
Plaintiff Will Moses Palmer, III, (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding se and in forma
18
pauperis in this civil rights action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff initiated this action on
19
April 28, 2006. (ECF No. 1.) This action now proceeds on Plaintiff’s second amended complaint
20
against Defendants Lopez, Jordnt, and Bardonnex for retaliation and denial of access to the courts.
21
(ECF Nos. 111, 112.)
22
On July 5, 2013, the Magistrate Judge issued findings and recommendations that Defendant
23
Lopez be dismissed from this action, without prejudice, based on Plaintiff’s failure to effect service of
24
summons and complaint pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(m). The findings and
25
recommendations were served on Plaintiff and contained notice that objections should be filed within
26
thirty (30) days after service. More than thirty (30) days have passed and Plaintiff has not filed any
27
objections.
28
1
1
In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C), this Court has conducted a de
2
novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the Court finds the findings and
3
recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper analysis.
4
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
5
1.
The findings and recommendations issued on July 5, 2013, are adopted in full; and
6
2.
Defendant Lopez is DISMISSED from this action, without prejudice, based on
7
Plaintiff’s failure to effect service of summons and complaint pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil
8
Procedure 4(m).
9
10
11
12
13
14
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
/s/ Lawrence J. O’Neill
August 12, 2013
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
DEAC_Signature-END:
b9ed48bb
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?