Palmer v. Woodford et al

Filing 84

ORDER to SHOW CAUSE Why Sanctions Should Not Be Issued for Defendants' Failure to Comply With an Order of the Court, re 70 , 77 signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 1/9/2012. Defendants' Show Cause Response due within thirty (30) days. (Jessen, A)

1
2
3
4
5
6

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

7
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
8
9

WILL MOSES PALMER, III,

10

Plaintiff,

11
12

CASE NO. 1:06-cv-00512-LJO-BAM PC
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE

v.

(ECF Nos. 70, 77)

JEANNE WOODFORD, et al.,

13

THIRTY-DAY DEADLINE

Defendants.
/

14
15

Plaintiff Will Moses, Palmer, III (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se in this civil

16

rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On May 17, 2006, Plaintiff consented to the jurisdiction

17

of the Magistrate Judge. (ECF No. 5.) On October 6, 2011, an order was issued directing

18

Defendants to file a consent or decline form within thirty days. (ECF No. 70.) Defendants did not

19

file a consent or decline form or otherwise respond to the order. On November 22, 2011, a second

20

order issued directing Defendants to consent or decline within thirty days. (ECF No. 77.) More than

21

thirty days have passed and Defendants have not filed a consent or decline form or otherwise

22

responded to the order.

23

Accordingly, within thirty days from the date of service of this order, Defendants are ordered

24

to show cause why sanctions should not be issued for their failure to comply with an order of the

25

court.

26
27

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
10c20k

January 9, 2012

/s/ Barbara A. McAuliffe
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

28
1