Palmer v. Woodford et al
Filing
84
ORDER to SHOW CAUSE Why Sanctions Should Not Be Issued for Defendants' Failure to Comply With an Order of the Court, re 70 , 77 signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 1/9/2012. Defendants' Show Cause Response due within thirty (30) days. (Jessen, A)
1
2
3
4
5
6
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
8
9
WILL MOSES PALMER, III,
10
Plaintiff,
11
12
CASE NO. 1:06-cv-00512-LJO-BAM PC
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE
v.
(ECF Nos. 70, 77)
JEANNE WOODFORD, et al.,
13
THIRTY-DAY DEADLINE
Defendants.
/
14
15
Plaintiff Will Moses, Palmer, III (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se in this civil
16
rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On May 17, 2006, Plaintiff consented to the jurisdiction
17
of the Magistrate Judge. (ECF No. 5.) On October 6, 2011, an order was issued directing
18
Defendants to file a consent or decline form within thirty days. (ECF No. 70.) Defendants did not
19
file a consent or decline form or otherwise respond to the order. On November 22, 2011, a second
20
order issued directing Defendants to consent or decline within thirty days. (ECF No. 77.) More than
21
thirty days have passed and Defendants have not filed a consent or decline form or otherwise
22
responded to the order.
23
Accordingly, within thirty days from the date of service of this order, Defendants are ordered
24
to show cause why sanctions should not be issued for their failure to comply with an order of the
25
court.
26
27
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
10c20k
January 9, 2012
/s/ Barbara A. McAuliffe
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
28
1
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?