James P. Bash v. Snyed et al
Filing
21
ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS And RECOMMENDATIONS 20 , And Dismissing Action For Failure To Obey A Court Order, signed by Judge Oliver W. Wanger on 4/14/2009. It is ORDERED that: The Findings and Recommendations, filed February 9, 2009, is adopted in full. This action is dismissed for failure to obey a court order. CASE CLOSED. (Scrivner, E)
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 / 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Plaintiff James P. Bash ("plaintiff") is a state prisoner proceeding pro se in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 72-302. On February 19, 2009, the Magistrate Judge filed a Findings and Recommendations herein which was served on plaintiff and which contained notice to plaintiff that any objection to the Findings and Recommendations was to be filed within thirty days. Plaintiff did not file a timely Objection to the Findings and Recommendations. In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C), this Court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the Court finds the Findings and Recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper analysis. /// /// 1 v. DR. SNYED, et al., (Doc. 20) Defendants. JAMES P. BASH, Plaintiff, CASE NO. 1:06-cv-00674-OWW DLB PC ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS, AND DISMISSING ACTION FOR FAILURE TO OBEY A COURT ORDER
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. 2. The Findings and Recommendations, filed February 9, 2009, is adopted in full; and This action is dismissed for failure to obey a court order.
IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: April 14, 2009 emm0d6 /s/ Oliver W. Wanger UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?