Ackley v. Carroll et al

Filing 41

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto on 7/15/2010 granting Defendants a 14-day extension of time to conduct Plaintiff's deposition and to file a motion to compel the deposition and to conduct Plaintiff's deposition via a video conference. (Lundstrom, T)

Download PDF
(PC) Ackley v. Carroll et al Doc. 41 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 /// /// 1 Dockets.Justia.com UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DONALD J. ACKLEY, Plaintiff, v. D. CARROLL, et al., Defendants. / CASE NO. 1:06-cv-00771-AWI-SKO PC ORDER Plaintiff Donald J. Ackley ("Plaintiff") is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On June 30, 2010, the Court issued an order directing Defendants to notify the Court regarding whether they intend to depose Plaintiff and whether they required an extension of time to schedule and conduct the deposition. (Doc. #39.) On July 13, 2010, Defendants informed the Court that Plaintiff's deposition is scheduled to occur on July 30, 2010. Defendants request a fourteen (14) day extension of the discovery deadlines to conduct Plaintiff's deposition and file a motion to compel concerning Plaintiff's deposition, if necessary. Defendants also request permission to conduct Plaintiff's deposition via a video conference. Accordingly, it is HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. Defendants are granted a fourteen (14) day extension of time to conduct Plaintiff's deposition and file a motion to compel concerning the deposition, if necessary; and 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2. Defendants are granted permission to conduct Plaintiff's deposition via a video conference. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: ie14hj July 15, 2010 /s/ Sheila K. Oberto UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?