Ackley v. Carroll et al
Filing
73
ORDER DENYING 69 and 70 Motion for Separate Trials and Settlement Conference, signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 10/24/2011. (Martin-Gill, S)
1
2
3
4
5
6
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
8
9
DONALD J. ACKLEY,
10
11
12
13
CASE NO. 1:06-cv-00771-AWI-BAM PC
Plaintiff,
ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR
SEPARATE TRIALS AND SETTLEMENT
CONFERENCE
v.
D. CARROLL, et al.,
(ECF Nos. 69, 70)
Defendants.
/
14
15
Plaintiff Donald J. Ackley (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma
16
pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On September 28, 2011, orders
17
issued denying Plaintiff’s motion for separate trial and informing the parties that no settlement
18
conference would be scheduled because Defendants believe settlement is unlikely and are not
19
interested in participating in settlement negotiations. (ECF Nos. 64, 66.) On September 21, 2011,
20
Plaintiff filed a response to the settlement order requesting that a settlement conference be scheduled
21
and a motion for separate trials. (ECF Nos. 69, 70.)
22
The request for a settlement conference and motion for separate trials are construed to be a
23
motion for reconsideration, and as such they are without merit. Federal Rule of Civil Procedure
24
60(b) governs the reconsideration of final orders of the district court. The Rule permits a district
25
court to relieve a party from a final order or judgment on grounds of: “(1) mistake, inadvertence,
26
surprise, or excusable neglect; (3) fraud . . . of an adverse party, . . . or (6) any other reason justifying
27
relief from the operation of the judgment.” Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b). Plaintiff’s opposition is devoid
28
of any ground entitling Plaintiff to reconsideration of the Court’s order.
1
1
2
Accordingly, Plaintiff’s request for a settlement conference and motion for separate trials,
filed October 21, 2011, is HEREBY DENIED.
3
4
5
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
1c20kb
October 24, 2011
/s/ Barbara A. McAuliffe
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?