Brown v. Placement Pros, Vedior North America

Filing 4

INFORMATIONAL ORDER. Signed by Judge Dennis L. Beck on 6/23/06. (Gil-Garcia, A)

Brown v. Placement Pros, Vedior North America

Doc. 4

Case 1:06-cv-00789-OWW-DLB

Document 4

Filed 06/26/2006

Page 1 of 5

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 TIMOTHY P. BROWN, 9 10 Plaintiff, 11 v. 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27
1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
) 1:06cv00789 OWW DLB ) ) ) INFORMATIONAL ORDER ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

PLACEMENT PROS, VEDIOR NORTH AMERICA,

Defendants.

P a r tie s to this litigation shall take note of the following requirements: In litigating this action, the parties must comply with the Federal Rules of Civil P r o c e d u re and the Local Rules of the United States District Court, Eastern District of C a lif o rn ia ("Local Rules"). This order highlights specific rules of which the parties s h o u ld take particular note. Failure to comply with the Local Rules, federal rules or a c o u r t order, including this order, will be grounds for dismissal, entry of default or o t h e r appropriate sanctions. See Local Rule 11-110; F.R.Civ.P. 41(b). 1. D o cu m en ts intended to be filed with the Court must be mailed to the Clerk

o f the Court. See Local Rule 5-134(a). All documents improperly mailed to a judge's c h a m b e r s will be stricken from the record.1 A document requesting a Court order must

28

W h e n a document is stricken, it becomes a nullity and is not considered by the Court for any

p u rp o se s.

1
Dockets.Justia.com

Case 1:06-cv-00789-OWW-DLB

Document 4

Filed 06/26/2006

Page 2 of 5

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

b e styled as a motion. See F.R.Civ.P. 7. 2. E a c h document submitted for filing must include the original signature of

th e filing party or parties. Local Rule 7-131; F.R.Civ.P. 11(a). All documents s u b m itte d without the required signature(s) will be stricken. Each separate document m u s t be separately stapled. See Local Rule 7-130. If a document is stapled behind a n o th e r document, it will not be filed and will not be entered on this Court's docket. 3. All documents filed with the Court must be submitted with an additional legible

conformed copy for the Court's use. See Local Rule 5-133(d)(2). A document submitted without an extra copy for the Court's use will be stricken. If the filing party wishes the Court to return a file-stamped copy, he or she must include an additional copy for that purpose (i.e., submit an original and two copies, one for the Court's use and one to be returned). The Court cannot provide copy or mailing service for a party, even for an indigent plaintiff proceeding in forma pauperis. Therefore, if the filing party wishes a file-stamped copy returned, the party must also provide an envelope with adequate postage pre-paid. Copies of documents from the Court file may be obtained at the cost of 50 cents per page. 4. After any defendants have appeared in an action by filing a pleading responsive to

the complaint (i.e., an answer or a motion to dismiss), all documents filed with the Court must include a certificate of service stating that a copy of the document was served on the opposing party. See F.R.Civ.P. 5; Local Rule 5-135(c). A document submitted without the required proof of service will be stricken. Where a party is represented, service on the party's attorney of record constitutes effective service. A sample of a proper proof of service is attached hereto. 5. All filings must bear the file number assigned to the action, followed by the

initials of the District Court Judge and the Magistrate Judge to whom the case is assigned. Where plaintiff simultaneously pursues more than one action, he or she must file separate original documents and the appropriate number of copies in each action to which the document pertains. Documents submitted listing more than one case number in the caption will be stricken. 6. The Court cannot serve as a repository for the parties' evidence. The parties may 2

Case 1:06-cv-00789-OWW-DLB

Document 4

Filed 06/26/2006

Page 3 of 5

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

not file evidence with the Court until the course of litigation brings the evidence into question (for example, on a motion for summary judgment, at trial, or when requested by the Court). Evidence improperly submitted to the Court will be stricken and returned to the party. 7. All Court deadlines will be strictly enforced. Requests for time extensions must

state the reason the extension is needed and must be filed with the Court before the deadline in question. See Local Rule 6-144. 8. A plaintiff proceeding in propria persona has an affirmative duty to keep the Court

and opposing parties informed of his or her current address. If a plaintiff moves and fails to file a notice of change of address, service of Court orders at plaintiff's prior address shall constitute effective notice. See Local Rule 83-182(f). If mail directed to plaintiff is returned by the U.S. Postal Service as undeliverable, the Court will not attempt to remail it. If the address is not updated within 60 days of the mail being returned, the action will be dismissed for failure to prosecute. See Local Rule 83-183(b). 9. Due to the press of business, the Court cannot respond to individual requests for

the status of cases. Any such requests will be denied. So long as the parties inform the Court of any address changes in compliance with Local Rule 83-183(b), the Court will notify the parties of any Court action taken in their case. 10. Defendants must reply to the complaint within the time provided by the

applicable provisions of Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(a). 11. Unless otherwise ordered, all motions to dismiss, motions for summary

judgment, motions concerning discovery, motions pursuant to F.R.Civ.P. 7, 11, 12, 15, 41, 55, 56, 59 and 60, and motions pursuant to Local Rule 11-110 shall be briefed pursuant to Local Rule 78-230. Failure to oppose such a motion timely may be deemed a waiver of opposition to the motion. 12. At some point in the litigation, one or more defendants may move for

summary judgment as to some or all of plaintiff's claims. Pursuant to Klingele v. Eikenberry, 849 F.2d 409 (9th Cir. 1988), plaintiff is advised of the following requirements for opposing a motion for summary judgment made by defendants pursuant to F.R.Civ.P. 56. Such a motion is a 3

Case 1:06-cv-00789-OWW-DLB

Document 4

Filed 06/26/2006

Page 4 of 5

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27

request for an order for judgment on some or all of plaintiff's claims in favor of defendants without trial. See F.R.Civ.P. 56(b). Defendant(s)' motion will set forth the facts which defendants contend are not reasonably subject to dispute and that entitle defendant to judgment as a matter of law. See F.R.Civ.P. 56(c). Plaintiff has the right to oppose a motion for summary judgment. To oppose the motion, plaintiff must show proof of his or her claims. Plaintiff may agree with the facts set forth in defendant(s)' motion but argue that defendant(s) are not entitled to judgment as a matter of law. Plaintiff may show defendant(s)' facts are disputed in one or more of the following ways: (1) plaintiff may rely upon statements made under the penalty of perjury in the complaint if the complaint shows that plaintiff has personal knowledge of the matters stated and if plaintiff calls to the court's attention those parts of the complaint upon which plaintiff relies; (2) plaintiff may also serve and file affidavits or declarations2 setting forth the facts which plaintiff believes prove plaintiff's claims (the persons who sign the affidavit or declaration must have personal knowledge of the facts stated); (3) plaintiff may also rely upon written records but plaintiff must prove that the records are what plaintiff claims they are:3 (4) plaintiff may also rely upon all or any part of the transcript of one or more depositions, answers to interrogatories, or admissions obtained in this proceeding. Should plaintiff fail to contradict defendants' motion with affidavits, declarations, or other evidence, defendants' evidence will be taken as truth, and final judgment may be entered without a full trial. See F.R.Civ.P. 56(e). If there is some good reason why such facts are not available to plaintiff when required to oppose such a motion, the Court will consider a request to postpone considering defendant(s)' motion. See F.R.Civ.P. 56(f). If plaintiff does not serve and file a request to postpone

2

A n affidavit is a written declaration or statement of facts, made voluntarily, and confirmed by the o a t h or affirmation of the party making it, taken before an officer having authority to administer s u c h oath. An unsworn declaration has the same effect as an affidavit, provided that it is dated and s ig n e d under penalty of perjury, as follows: "I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct." 28 U.S.C. § 1746. Affidavits and declarations must be made on personal k n o w l e d g e and must set forth facts as would be admissible in evidence. See F.R.Civ.P. 56(e). Sworn or certified copies of all papers referred to in an affidavit must be attached to the affidavit a n d served on the opposing party. F.R.Civ.P. 56(e).

3

28

4

Case 1:06-cv-00789-OWW-DLB

Document 4

Filed 06/26/2006

Page 5 of 5

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

consideration of defendant(s)' motion or written opposition to the motion, the court may consider plaintiff's failure to act as a waiver of opposition to defendant(s)' motion. Plaintiff's waiver of opposition to defendant(s)' motion may result in the entry of summary judgment against plaintiff. 13. stricken. 14. The failure of any party to comply with this order, the Federal Rules of A motion supported by affidavits or declarations that are unsigned will be

Civil Procedure, or the Local Rules of Court, may result in the imposition of sanctions including, but not limited to, dismissal of the action or entry of default.

IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: 3b142a June 23, 2006

/s/ Dennis L. Beck
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

5