Woodman v. Shoaf et al
ORDER, signed by Chief Judge B. Lynn Winmill on 9/24/10: Plaintiff's Motions for Reconsideration 70 & 72 are DENIED; Plaintiff's Motion to Alter or Amend Judgment 73 is DENIED; and Plaintiff's Motion for Appointment of Counsel 74 is DENIED. (Hellings, J)
(PC) Woodman v. Shoaf et al
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT F O R THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA F R E S N O DIVISION
J O H N WOODMAN, C a s e No. 1:06-cv-00817-BLW-LMB Plaintiff, ORDER v.
C H U C K SHOAF, Defendants.
P re v io u s ly in this case, Plaintiff was provided with additional time to respond to th e outstanding Motion for Summary Judgment and Amended Motion to Dismiss. When h e did not respond, his case was dismissed. Plaintiff has filed several post-judgment m o tio n s , all of which request that the Court reconsider appointing counsel for Plaintiff. P la in tif f has not addressed Defendants' Motion to Dismiss, which sought dismissal based o n Plaintiff's failure to comply with discovery requests. T h e Court concludes that, while Plaintiff takes various medications for mental illn e s s and/or personality disorders, it appears that he is stabilized on the medications. His a rg u m e n ts are articulate when compared to prisoners in general. Plaintiff failed to take a n y action to prosecute this case during the time period when he was released from prison
O RDER 1
earlier in this case, and, after a brief period of re-incarceration, it appears that he was no lo n g e r incarcerated as of April 2010. Finally, Plaintiff's case is not particularly difficult s u c h that appointment of counsel is necessary. Accordingly, Plaintiff's motions shall be d e n ie d . ORDER I T IS HEREBY ORDERED: 1. 2. 3. P la in tif f 's Motions for Reconsideration (Dkt. 70 & Dkt. 72) are DENIED; P la in tif f 's Motion to Alter or Amend Judgment (Dkt. 73) is DENIED; and P la in tif f 's Motion for Appointment of Counsel (Dkt. 74) is DENIED.
DATED: September 24, 2010
Honorable B. Lynn Winmill Chief U. S. District Judge
O RDER 2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?