Coleman v. Adams, et al.

Filing 13

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge William M. Wunderlich on 2/5/2009, GRANTING 11 Plaintiff's Proposed Changes in Support of Amended Complaint, Construed as a MOTION for LEAVE to AMEND. (Second Amended Complaint due by 3/10/2009). (Jessen, A)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 1 Plaintiff has filed a motion titled as a proposed change in support of amended complaint. Plaintiff seeks to make changes to the April 14, 2008, first amended complaint. Plaintiff is advised that the court cannot refer to a prior pleading in order to make plaintiff's amended complaint complete. Local Rule 15-220 requires that an amended complaint be complete in itself without reference to any prior pleading. This is because, as a general rule, an amended complaint supersedes the original complaint. See Loux v. Rhay, 375 F.2d 55, 57 (9th Cir. 1967). Once plaintiff files an amended complaint, the original pleading no longer serves any function in the case. Therefore, in an amended complaint, as in an original complaint, each claim and the involvement of each defendant must be sufficiently alleged. The court will grant Plaintiff leave to file a second amended complaint that includes all of his claims and allegations. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: DERRAL ADAMS, et al., Defendants. vs. SAAHDO COLEMAN, Plaintiff, 1: 06 CV 0836 AWI WMW PC ORDER RE MOTION (DOC 11) IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 1. Plaintiff's motion, construed as a motion for leave to amend the complaint, is granted. 2. Plaintiff is granted thirty days from the date of service of this order in which to file a second amended complaint that complies with the requirements of the Civil Rights Act, the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, and the Local Rules of Practice; the amended complaint must bear the docket number assigned this case and must be labeled "Second Amended Complaint." IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: February 5, 2009 mmkd34 /s/ William M. Wunderlich UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?