Hackworth v. Rangel et al

Filing 190

AMENDED ORDER DISREGARDING as moot Plaintiff's 184 Motion for Transcripts, signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 03/20/2015. (Martin-Gill, S)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

ROBERT HACKWORTH,

12
13
14
15

Plaintiff,
v.
P. RANGEL, et al.,
Defendants.

16

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

Case No.: 1:06-cv-00850-BAM (PC)
AMENDED ORDER DISREGARDING
PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR TRANSCRIPTS
(ECF No. 184)

17
18

Plaintiff Robert Hackworth (“Plaintiff”), a state prisoner, proceeded pro se and in forma

19

pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff pursued an excessive force

20

claim against Defendant Rangel. Following a trial, the jury returned a verdict in favor of Defendant

21

Rangel and judgment was entered. Plaintiff appealed.

22

On February 6, 2015, the Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit authorized production of the

23

reporter’s transcripts at government expense for the following dates: October 22, 23 and 24, 2013.

24

The Ninth Circuit directed that no further authorization from the district court was necessary and that

25

transcripts were due on March 16, 2015. (ECF No. 183.)

26
27

On February 25, 2015, Plaintiff filed a motion requesting transcripts pursuant to the Ninth
Circuit’s order. (ECF No. 184.)

28
1

1
2
3

On March 16, 2015, in compliance with the Ninth Circuit’s order, the court reporter filed the
transcripts. (ECF Nos. 186, 187, 188.) The transcripts have been mailed to Plaintiff.
Accordingly, Plaintiff’s motion requesting transcripts is HEREBY DISREGARDED as moot.

4
5
6
7

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:

/s/ Barbara

March 20, 2015

A. McAuliffe

_

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2