Anthony Hughes v. Claypool et al

Filing 18

ORDER Requiring Plaintiff to Furnish Further Information for Initiation of Service Process signed by Magistrate Judge William M. Wunderlich on 2/17/2009. ( Filing due by 3/18/2009.) (Figueroa, O)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 1983. This action is proceeding on plaintiff's complaint, filed July 11, 2006, against Defendant Claypool Because plaintiff is proceeding in forma pauperis, the court must appoint the United States Marshal to serve each defendant with a summons and complaint. Fed. R. Civ. Pro. 4(c)(2). On June 26, 2008, the summons for Defendant Claypool was returned unexecuted. The USM 285 form indicates that there is not an individual named Claypool at Pleasant Valley State Prison. Within thirty days from the date of service of this order, plaintiff shall provide the court with further information to assist the Marshal in serving Defendant Clayppol. If plaintiff can remember any other details that might assist the court and the Marshal, plaintiff shall so inform the court. Based on the foregoing, it is HEREBY ORDERED that within thirty (30) days from the date of service of this order, plaintiff shall provide the court with any and all information he has that might help the Marshal identify and serve Defendant Claypool. 1 vs. CLAYPOOL, Defendants. / ANTHONLY HUGHES, Plaintiff, CASE NO. 1:06-CV-0876 LJO WMW PC ORDER REQUIRING PLAINTIFF TO FURNISH FURTHER INFORMATION FOR INITIATION OF SERVICE OF PROCESS IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: February 17, 2009 mmkd34 /s/ William M. Wunderlich UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?