San Nicolas v. Ayers

Filing 124

ORDER Redacting Confidential Portions of the Transcript of the April 24, 2014 Hearing signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 4/29/2014. (Jessen, A)

Download PDF
1 2 3 UNITED ST U TATES DIST TRICT COURT 4 EASTERN DISTRICT O CALIFOR D OF RNIA 5 6 RODN NEY JESSE SAN NICOL S LAS, 7 Petitioner r, 8 9 10 0 ORDE REDACT ER TING CONF FIDENTIAL L PORT TIONS OF T THE TRANS SCRIPT OF APRIL 24, 2014 H L HEARING v. KEVIN CHAPPELL as Warde of Californ N L, en nia State Pr rison at San Quentin, Q (ECF N 122) No. Responde ent. 11 12 2 Case N 1:06-cv No. v-00942 LJO O-SAB The Court ha read and considered Petitioner’s application to seal the April 24, 2014 T as s n e 13 transcript and Exhibi A of that application. 3 t it a 14 4 FOR GOOD CAUSE SH HOWN if a transcript o f the April 24, 2014 he earing is ord dered, 15 only thos portions of the transcr discussin the conten of Sealed Claim 1 sh be redac 5 se o ript ng nts d hall cted. 16 6 If there is a request for the transcript of the hear f r ring, the par rties shall m and agre on meet ee 17 which po 7 ortions of the transcript should be re edacted in li ight of this o order. The p parties shall then l 18 submit both the reda 8 b acted and un n-redacted versions of th transcripts in camera for the cou to v he a urt 19 review al 9 long with a proposed ord referenci the page and lines nu p der ing umbers to be redacted. e 20 0 In the future, any request to seal a transcript of a hearing sh be made no later tha the n t hall an 21 conclusio of the he on earing. If such a requ s uest is made after the h e hearing, the request sha be all 22 accompa 2 anied by the transcript. If redaction is sought, th request m contain a proposed order I he must 23 detailing what should be redacted 3 d d. 24 4 25 5 26 6 T DERED. IT IS SO ORD Dated: D Ap 29, 201 pril 14 UNITE STATES MAGISTR ED S RATE JUDG GE 27 7 28 8 OReferring gCase2MJ-San n   

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?