San Nicolas v. Ayers
Filing
124
ORDER Redacting Confidential Portions of the Transcript of the April 24, 2014 Hearing signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 4/29/2014. (Jessen, A)
1
2
3
UNITED ST
U
TATES DIST
TRICT COURT
4
EASTERN DISTRICT O CALIFOR
D
OF
RNIA
5
6
RODN
NEY JESSE SAN NICOL
S
LAS,
7
Petitioner
r,
8
9
10
0
ORDE REDACT
ER
TING CONF
FIDENTIAL
L
PORT
TIONS OF T
THE TRANS
SCRIPT OF
APRIL 24, 2014 H
L
HEARING
v.
KEVIN CHAPPELL as Warde of Californ
N
L,
en
nia
State Pr
rison at San Quentin,
Q
(ECF N 122)
No.
Responde
ent.
11
12
2
Case N 1:06-cv
No.
v-00942 LJO
O-SAB
The Court ha read and considered Petitioner’s application to seal the April 24, 2014
T
as
s
n
e
13 transcript and Exhibi A of that application.
3
t
it
a
14
4
FOR GOOD CAUSE SH
HOWN if a transcript o f the April 24, 2014 he
earing is ord
dered,
15 only thos portions of the transcr discussin the conten of Sealed Claim 1 sh be redac
5
se
o
ript
ng
nts
d
hall
cted.
16
6
If there is a request for the transcript of the hear
f
r
ring, the par
rties shall m and agre on
meet
ee
17 which po
7
ortions of the transcript should be re
edacted in li
ight of this o
order. The p
parties shall then
l
18 submit both the reda
8
b
acted and un
n-redacted versions of th transcripts in camera for the cou to
v
he
a
urt
19 review al
9
long with a proposed ord referenci the page and lines nu
p
der
ing
umbers to be redacted.
e
20
0
In the future, any request to seal a transcript of a hearing sh be made no later tha the
n
t
hall
an
21 conclusio of the he
on
earing. If such a requ
s
uest is made after the h
e
hearing, the request sha be
all
22 accompa
2
anied by the transcript. If redaction is sought, th request m contain a proposed order
I
he
must
23 detailing what should be redacted
3
d
d.
24
4
25
5
26
6
T
DERED.
IT IS SO ORD
Dated:
D
Ap 29, 201
pril
14
UNITE STATES MAGISTR
ED
S
RATE JUDG
GE
27
7
28
8
OReferring
gCase2MJ-San
n
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?